• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结局研究与健康相关专业人员

Outcomes research and the allied health professional.

作者信息

Benjamin K

机构信息

Center for Medical Effectiveness Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 1995 Winter;24(1):3-12.

PMID:7657584
Abstract

Outcomes research has become increasingly important in recent years in evaluating the quality of health care and in making policy and clinical decisions. There has been a growing awareness of the need to adapt outcomes research methods for the assessment of treatments provided by the allied health research and professional communities. This is imperative due to the growth of managed care plans and the need for professional legitimization and separate reimbursement of services. This article provides an overview of the history of the outcomes research movement, with specific reference to federal government involvement. Differences between efficacy and effectiveness research are delineated, the problems in undertaking outcomes studies to evaluate allied health-provided treatments are discussed, and strategy for increasing the use of outcomes research in the assessment of allied health treatments is given.

摘要

近年来,结果研究在评估医疗保健质量以及制定政策和临床决策方面变得越来越重要。人们越来越意识到需要调整结果研究方法,以评估联合健康研究和专业团体提供的治疗。由于管理式医疗计划的增长以及专业合法化和服务单独报销的需求,这一点至关重要。本文概述了结果研究运动的历史,特别提及了联邦政府的参与。阐述了疗效研究与效果研究之间的差异,讨论了开展结果研究以评估联合健康提供的治疗时存在的问题,并给出了在评估联合健康治疗中增加使用结果研究的策略。

相似文献

1
Outcomes research and the allied health professional.结局研究与健康相关专业人员
J Allied Health. 1995 Winter;24(1):3-12.
2
Allied health outcomes research using a collaborative distance approach.采用协作远程方法的联合健康结果研究。
J Allied Health. 2000 Summer;29(2):99-102.
3
Comparative effectiveness research.比较效果研究
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Aug;6(8):547-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.04.017.
4
Coming together, moving apart: a history of the term allied health in education, accreditation, and practice.汇聚与分离:联合健康在教育、认证及实践领域的术语史
J Allied Health. 2008 Spring;37(1):45-52.
5
Think before you prep: defining the terms of change in American healthcare.准备之前先思考:界定美国医疗保健领域的变革条件。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Nov;60(5):1530-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00799-Q.
6
Quality of life assessment: understanding its use as an outcome measure.生活质量评估:理解其作为一项结果指标的用途。
Hosp Formul. 1993 May;28(5):486-90, 492, 497-8.
7
Monitoring and evaluating managed care for children with chronic illnesses and disabilities.监测和评估针对患有慢性疾病和残疾儿童的管理式医疗。
Pediatrics. 1996 Nov;98(5):952-8.
8
The outcomes movement and the role of health information managers.
Top Health Inf Manage. 1998 May;18(4):1-12.
9
Outcomes research. Clues to quality and organizational effectiveness?
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):589-601.
10
Cost-effective health care: tools for improvement.具有成本效益的医疗保健:改进工具。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1994 Spring;19(2):53-61.