Bridge D, Cunningham C W, DeSalle R, Buss L W
Department of Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jul;12(4):679-89. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040246.
The evolutionary history of cnidarian life cycles has been debated since the 1880s, with different hypotheses favored even by current textbooks. Contributing to the disagreement is the fact that the systematic relationships of the four cnidarian classes have received relatively little examination using modern systematic methods. Here we present analyses of class-level relationships based on 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence, mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence, mitochondrial genome structure, and morphological characters. DNA sequences were aligned using a repeatable parsimony-based approach incorporating a range of alignment parameters. Analyses of individual data sets and of all data combined are unanimous in grouping the classes possessing a medusa stage, leaving the holobenthic Anthozoa basal within the phylum.
自19世纪80年代以来,刺胞动物生命周期的进化史一直存在争议,甚至连当前的教科书都支持不同的假说。造成这种分歧的原因是,使用现代系统方法对刺胞动物四个纲的系统关系进行的研究相对较少。在此,我们基于18S核糖体DNA(rDNA)序列、线粒体16S rDNA序列、线粒体基因组结构和形态特征,对纲级关系进行了分析。DNA序列使用基于简约法的可重复方法进行比对,该方法纳入了一系列比对参数。对单个数据集以及所有组合数据的分析一致表明,具有水母体阶段的纲被归为一组,而全底栖的珊瑚纲则处于该门的基部位置。