Zardini M, Thakur R K, Klein G J, Yee R
Arrhythmia Service, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jun;18(6):1255-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06965.x.
Idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (ILVT) characterized by right bundle branch block, left axis morphology, response to verapamil and inducibility from the atrium in patients without structural heart disease may represent a distinct clinical entity. We report our experience with catheter ablation of this uncommon arrhythmia using radiofrequency energy (RF) and/or direct current (DC) shocks. Six men and 2 women, aged 16-50 years (mean +/- SD, 32 +/- 13), had recurrent VT for 16 +/- 16 years with a mean frequency of 4 +/- 3 episodes/year. Three patients had syncope during VT. None had identifiable structural heart disease. Catheter ablation was guided by earliest endocardial activation, presence of a high frequency presystolic potential and/or pacemapping of the left ventricle. The left ventricle was accessed via a retrograde aortic approach in 6 patients, a transeptal approach in 1 patient, and a combined approach in the remaining patient. All patients had inducible right bundle branch block morphology, left axis VT with a mean cycle length (CL) of 361 +/- 61 ms. A presystolic potential preceding ventricular activation and the His potential during VT was identified in 4 patients. All ablation sites were identified in a relatively uniform location, in the inferoapical left ventricle. Noninducibility of VT was obtained with RF in 3 patients and with DC in 5 patients. In 1 patient, DC delivery after unsuccessful RF prevented further inducibility. Similarly, RF was successful in 1 patient in whom an initial DC attempt was ineffective. Mean total procedure time was 282 +/- 51 minutes and mean total fluoroscopy time was 40 +/- 15 minutes. There were no complications. One patient treated with DC shock had recurrence of VT during treadmill test the day after ablation and refused repeat ablation. During a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 13 months, no VT recurrences or other cardiovascular events occurred. In conclusion, catheter ablation in the inferoapical left ventricle is an effective treatment for this type of ILVT. RF energy can be safely complemented by low energy DC shocks when the former is ineffective.
特发性左心室心动过速(ILVT)表现为右束支传导阻滞、电轴左偏形态,对维拉帕米有反应且在无结构性心脏病患者中可从心房诱发,可能代表一种独特的临床实体。我们报告了使用射频能量(RF)和/或直流电(DC)电击对这种不常见心律失常进行导管消融的经验。6名男性和2名女性,年龄16 - 50岁(平均±标准差,32±13),有反复发作的室性心动过速(VT)16±16年,平均发作频率为4±3次/年。3例患者在VT发作时有晕厥。均无可识别的结构性心脏病。导管消融以最早的心内膜激动、高频收缩前期电位的存在和/或左心室起搏标测为指导。6例患者通过逆行主动脉途径进入左心室,1例通过经房间隔途径,其余1例采用联合途径。所有患者均可诱发右束支传导阻滞形态、电轴左偏的VT,平均周长(CL)为361±61毫秒。4例患者在心室激动前发现收缩前期电位以及VT发作时的希氏束电位。所有消融部位均位于左心室下尖部相对一致的位置。3例患者通过RF实现VT不能诱发,5例患者通过DC实现。1例患者在RF失败后给予DC电击防止了进一步诱发。同样,1例最初DC尝试无效的患者RF成功。平均总手术时间为282±51分钟,平均总透视时间为40±15分钟。无并发症发生。1例接受DC电击治疗的患者在消融后第二天的平板运动试验中VT复发,拒绝再次消融。在平均17±13个月的随访期间,未发生VT复发或其他心血管事件。总之,左心室下尖部的导管消融是治疗此类ILVT的有效方法。当RF能量无效时,低能量DC电击可安全地作为补充。