• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏部位、普鲁卡因胺和导联配置对易损性上限与除颤阈值之间关系的影响。

Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold.

作者信息

Fan W, Gotoh M, Chen P S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jun;18(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06969.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06969.x
PMID:7659583
Abstract

In six open chest dogs, we determined the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) and defibrillation threshold (DFT) by an up-down algorithm when the pacing site was at the right atrium, at the left ventricular apex, and at the left ventricular base. Monophasic shocks (6 ms) were given to epicardial patches at 20 and 40 ms before the peak of the T wave to bracket the mid-upslope. In an additional six closed-chest dogs, we determined the ULV and the DFT with transvenous leads with an 8-ms biphasic waveform. The S1 pacing site was at the right ventricular apex and the right atrium, and the shocks were given at 20 ms and 40 ms before the peak of the T wave, and on the peak of T wave. The same test was repeated after intravenous procainamide infusion (20 mg/Kg loading, then 2 mg/min maintenance). In the first six dogs, the ULV determined when pacing was given to the left ventricular apex, the left ventricular base, and the right atrium was 4.2 +/- 1.7 J, 4.4 +/- 2.1 J, and 3.9 +/- 1.5 J, respectively; values that were not significantly different from the DFT of 4.8 +/- 1.9 J, 4.5 +/- 1.9 J, and 4.2 +/- 1.3 J, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在6只开胸犬中,当起搏部位分别位于右心房、左心室心尖部和左心室基部时,我们采用上下算法确定了易损性上限(ULV)和除颤阈值(DFT)。在T波峰值前20和40毫秒时,向心外膜贴片给予6毫秒的单相电击,以覆盖上升支中部。在另外6只闭胸犬中,我们使用8毫秒双相波形的经静脉导线确定了ULV和DFT。S1起搏部位位于右心室心尖部和右心房,电击分别在T波峰值前20毫秒和40毫秒以及T波峰值时给予。静脉输注普鲁卡因酰胺(负荷量20毫克/千克,然后以2毫克/分钟维持)后重复相同测试。在前6只犬中,当起搏部位为左心室心尖部、左心室基部和右心房时,确定的ULV分别为4.2±1.7焦耳、4.4±2.1焦耳和3.9±1.5焦耳;这些值分别与DFT的4.8±1.9焦耳、4.5±1.9焦耳和4.2±1.3焦耳无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold.起搏部位、普鲁卡因胺和导联配置对易损性上限与除颤阈值之间关系的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jun;18(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06969.x.
2
Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.起搏频率和除颤电击时机对开胸犬除颤阈值与易损上限之间关系的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;18(6):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90690-b.
3
Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.单相电击和双相电击的易损性上限时间不同:对除颤阈值测定的影响
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04234.x.
4
Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.快速起搏和T波扫描对除颤与易损性上限剂量反应曲线之间关系的影响。
Circulation. 1995 Sep 1;92(5):1291-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1291.
5
Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.经静脉电极极性和波形持续时间对除颤阈值与易损上限之间关系的影响。
Circulation. 1997 Aug 19;96(4):1351-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1351.
6
Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.利多卡因对开胸犬除颤阈值与易损性上限关系的影响。
Circulation. 1992 Mar;85(3):1146-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.3.1146.
7
Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.单相和双相刺激对正常和梗死犬的电生理效应。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Sep;13(9):1158-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02174.x.
8
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.正常窦性心律下测定的急性和慢性除颤阈值与易损上限的相关性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592.
9
Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.除颤阈值与心室易损性上限的比较。
Circulation. 1986 May;73(5):1022-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.5.1022.
10
Effects of procainamide on wave-front dynamics during ventricular fibrillation in open-chest dogs.普鲁卡因酰胺对开胸犬心室颤动期间波前动力学的影响。
Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1828-36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1828.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of drugs on defibrillation capacity.药物对除颤能力的影响。
Drugs. 2008;68(5):607-30. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868050-00004.