von Birgelen C, Umans V A, Di Mario C, Keane D, Gil R, Prati F, de Feyter P, Serruys P W
Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Am Heart J. 1995 Sep;130(3 Pt 1):405-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90344-5.
High-speed rotational coronary atherectomy (RA) is primarily used to treat complex lesions. Quantitative angiographic analysis of such complex lesions by edge detection is often unsuitable, whereas videodensitometry, measuring vessel dimensions independently of the target stenosis contours, may offer potential advantages. To gain insight into the operative mechanism of RA and to study the agreement between the two quantitative angiographic methods in measuring the minimal luminal cross-sectional area, the edge detection and videodensitometry techniques were applied to coronary angiograms of 21 lesions in 19 patients with symptoms who underwent successful RA and balloon angioplasty (BA). Obstruction diameter as determined by edge detection increased from 1.00 +/- 0.31 mm before intervention to 1.35 +/- 0.29 mm after RA (p < 0.001) and further increased to 1.74 +/- 0.33 mm after adjunctive BA (p > 0.001). The mean between-method difference (edge detection minus videodensitometry) was 0.34 mm2 before intervention, 0.13 mm2 after RA, and 0.09 mm2 after adjunctive BA (not significant). The standard deviation of the differences decreased from +/- 0.87 mm2 before intervention to +/- 0.80 mm2 after RA (not significant) and increased after BA significantly to +/- 1.21 mm2 (p < 0.05). Thus edge detection and videodensitometry provided equivalent immediate angiographic results after RA and adjunctive BA. The good agreement after RA may reflect the operative mechanism of RA, which by ablation of noncompliant plaque material yields a circular symmetric lumen with smooth surface. The increased dispersion of the between-method differences observed after adjunctive BA presumably results from dissections, plaque ruptures, and loss of luminal smoothness after balloon dilatation.
高速旋转冠状动脉斑块旋切术(RA)主要用于治疗复杂病变。通过边缘检测对这类复杂病变进行定量血管造影分析通常并不适用,而视频密度测定法独立于目标狭窄轮廓测量血管尺寸,可能具有潜在优势。为深入了解RA的手术机制,并研究两种定量血管造影方法在测量最小管腔横截面积方面的一致性,将边缘检测和视频密度测定技术应用于19例有症状患者的21处病变的冠状动脉造影,这些患者均成功接受了RA和球囊血管成形术(BA)。边缘检测确定的阻塞直径在干预前为1.00±0.31mm,RA后增加至1.35±0.29mm(p<0.001),辅助BA后进一步增加至1.74±0.33mm(p>0.001)。干预前方法间平均差异(边缘检测减去视频密度测定)为0.34mm²,RA后为0.13mm²,辅助BA后为0.09mm²(无统计学意义)。差异的标准差从干预前的±0.87mm²降至RA后的±0.80mm²(无统计学意义),BA后显著增加至±1.21mm²(p<0.05)。因此,边缘检测和视频密度测定在RA和辅助BA后提供了等效的即时血管造影结果。RA后良好的一致性可能反映了RA的手术机制,即通过消融不顺应性斑块物质产生具有光滑表面的圆形对称管腔。辅助BA后观察到的方法间差异的分散性增加可能是由于球囊扩张后出现夹层、斑块破裂和管腔光滑度丧失所致。