Englund A, Rosenqvist M, Bergfeldt L
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Am Heart J. 1995 Sep;130(3 Pt 1):481-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90355-0.
The aim of this study was to examine the utility of signal-averaged electrocardiography in relation to inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with bundle branch block. One hundred fourteen patients with bundle branch block underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography in the time domain and programmed ventricular stimulation. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced in 17 patients. The mean values of the three signal-averaged electrocardiographic variables analyzed differed significantly between the inducible and the noninducible group. The filtered QRS duration showed the most prominent difference between the two groups, and a filtered QRS duration > or = 155 msec had a sensitivity of approximately 80%, a specificity of 60%, and a total predictive value of 65%. In the subgroup of patients with syncope, a combination of these criteria with a history of coronary artery disease had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90%.
本研究的目的是探讨信号平均心电图在束支传导阻滞患者中与可诱发的持续性单形性室性心动过速的相关性。114例束支传导阻滞患者接受了时域信号平均心电图检查和程控心室刺激。17例患者诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速。分析的三个信号平均心电图变量的平均值在可诱发组和不可诱发组之间有显著差异。滤波后的QRS时限在两组之间差异最为显著,滤波后的QRS时限≥155毫秒时,敏感性约为80%,特异性为60%,总预测值为65%。在晕厥患者亚组中,这些标准与冠状动脉疾病史相结合,敏感性为100%,特异性为90%。