• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ISIS-4:一项随机析因试验,在58050例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中评估早期口服卡托普利、口服单硝酸酯和静脉注射硫酸镁。ISIS-4(第四次国际心肌梗死存活研究)协作组

ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

出版信息

Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):669-85.

PMID:7661937
Abstract

58,050 patients entering 1086 hospitals up to 24 h (median 8 h) after the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI) with no clear contraindications to the study treatments (in particular, no cardiogenic shock or persistent severe hypotension) were randomised in a "2 x 2 x 2 factorial" study. The treatment comparisons were: (i) 1 month of oral captopril (6.25 mg initial dose titrated up to 50 mg twice daily) versus matching placebo; (ii) 1 month of oral controlled-release mononitrate (30 mg initial dose titrated up to 60 mg once daily) versus matching placebo; and (iii) 24 h of intravenous magnesium sulphate (8 mmol initial bolus followed by 72 mmol) versus open control. There were no significant "interactions" between the effects of these three treatments, and the results for each are based on the randomised comparison of about 29,000 active versus 29,000 control allocated patients. Captopril There was a significant 7% (SD 3) proportional reduction in 5-week mortality (2088 [7.19%] captopril-allocated deaths vs 2231 [7.69%] placebo; 2p = 0.02), which corresponds to an absolute difference of 4.9 SD 2.2 fewer deaths per 1000 patients treated for 1 month. The absolute benefits appeared to be larger (perhaps about 10 fewer deaths per 1000) in certain higher-risk groups, such as those presenting with a history of previous MI or with heart failure. The survival advantage appeared to be maintained in the longer term (5.4 [SD 2.8] fewer deaths per 1000 at 12 months). Captopril was associated with an increase of 52 (SD 2) patients per 1000 in hypotension considered severe enough to require termination of study treatment, of 5 (SD 2) per 1000 in reported cardiogenic shock, and of 5 (SD 1) per 1000 in some degree of renal dysfunction. It produced no excess of deaths on days 0-1, even among patients with low blood pressure at entry. Mononitrate There was no significant reduction in 5-week mortality, either overall (2129 [7.34%] mononitrate-allocated deaths vs 2190 [7.54%] placebo) or in any subgroup examined (including those receiving short-term non-study intravenous or oral nitrates at entry). Further follow-up did not indicate any later survival advantage. The only significant side-effect of the mononitrate regimen studied was an increase of 15 (SD 2) per 1000 in hypotension. Those allocated active treatment had somewhat fewer deaths on days 0-1, which is reassuring a bout the safety of using nitrates early in acute MI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

在疑似急性心肌梗死(MI)发作后24小时内(中位数为8小时)进入1086家医院的58050例患者,若对研究治疗无明确禁忌(特别是无心源性休克或持续性严重低血压),则被纳入一项“2×2×2析因”研究进行随机分组。治疗比较如下:(i)口服卡托普利1个月(初始剂量6.25毫克,滴定至每日两次,每次50毫克)与匹配的安慰剂;(ii)口服控释单硝酸异山梨酯1个月(初始剂量30毫克,滴定至每日一次,每次60毫克)与匹配的安慰剂;(iii)静脉注射硫酸镁24小时(初始推注8毫摩尔,随后72毫摩尔)与开放对照。这三种治疗效果之间无显著“相互作用”,每种治疗的结果均基于约29000例接受活性药物治疗与29000例接受对照治疗患者的随机比较。

卡托普利

5周死亡率显著降低7%(标准差3)(卡托普利组分配患者中有2088例[7.19%]死亡,安慰剂组为2231例[7.69%];P = 0.02),这相当于每1000例接受1个月治疗的患者中,死亡人数绝对差异为4.9(标准差2.2)例减少。在某些高危组中,绝对益处似乎更大(每1000例中可能减少约10例死亡),例如有既往心肌梗死病史或心力衰竭的患者。生存优势在长期似乎得以维持(12个月时每1000例中死亡人数减少5.4[标准差2.8]例)。卡托普利与每1000例中因低血压严重到需要终止研究治疗的患者增加52(标准差2)例、报告的心源性休克每1000例中增加5(标准差2)例以及某种程度肾功能不全每1000例中增加5(标准差1)例相关。在0至1天内未导致死亡人数过多,即使是入院时血压低的患者。

单硝酸异山梨酯

5周死亡率总体上无显著降低(单硝酸异山梨酯组分配患者中有2129例[7.34%]死亡,安慰剂组为2190例[7.54%]),在任何检查的亚组中(包括入院时接受短期非研究静脉或口服硝酸盐的患者)也无显著降低。进一步随访未显示任何后期生存优势。所研究的单硝酸异山梨酯方案唯一显著的副作用是低血压每1000例中增加15(标准差2)例。接受活性治疗的患者在0至1天内死亡人数略少,这让人对急性心肌梗死早期使用硝酸盐的安全性放心。(摘要截短至400字)

相似文献

1
ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-4:一项随机析因试验,在58050例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中评估早期口服卡托普利、口服单硝酸酯和静脉注射硫酸镁。ISIS-4(第四次国际心肌梗死存活研究)协作组
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):669-85.
2
Randomized controlled trial of oral captopril, of oral isosorbide mononitrate and of intravenous magnesium sulphate started early in acute myocardial infarction: safety and haemodynamic effects. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Pilot Study Investigators.急性心肌梗死早期口服卡托普利、口服单硝酸异山梨酯及静脉注射硫酸镁的随机对照试验:安全性及血流动力学效应。ISIS - 4(第四次心肌梗死存活国际研究)初步研究调查组。
Eur Heart J. 1994 May;15(5):608-19. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060556.
3
Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival: protocol for a large simple study of the effects of oral mononitrate, of oral captopril, and of intravenous magnesium. ISIS-4 collaborative group.
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Nov 18;68(14):87D-100D. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90265-m.
4
Oral captopril versus placebo among 13,634 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: interim report from the Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-1).
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):686-7.
5
Hemodynamic effects of captopril and isosorbide mononitrate started early in acute myocardial infarction: a randomized placebo-controlled study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jul;22(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90817-k.
6
Oral captopril versus placebo among 14,962 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-1) Collaborative Group.14962例疑似急性心肌梗死患者口服卡托普利与安慰剂对照研究:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。中国心脏研究(CCS-1)协作组
Chin Med J (Engl). 1997 Nov;110(11):834-8.
7
ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-2研究:疑似急性心肌梗死患者在静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者联合或两者均不用的随机对照试验中的10年生存率。ISIS-2(第二项心肌梗死生存国际研究)协作组
BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1337-43. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1337.
8
Captopril. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy after myocardial infarction and in ischaemic heart disease.卡托普利。关于其在心肌梗死后及缺血性心脏病中的药理学和治疗效果的综述。
Drugs Aging. 1995 Sep;7(3):226-53. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199507030-00007.
9
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究)协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.
10
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The NITRATE-OCT study-inorganic nitrate reduces in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.硝酸盐-辛伐他汀研究——无机硝酸盐可降低稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的支架内再狭窄:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 18;77:102885. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102885. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.分流术治疗特发性正常压力脑积水。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 6;8(8):CD014923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014923.pub2.
3
Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.
拉丁美洲急性冠状动脉综合征出院推荐指南。
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024;94(Supl 2):1-52. doi: 10.24875/ACM.M24000096.
4
The role of magnesium in cardiac arrest.镁在心脏骤停中的作用。
Front Nutr. 2024 May 15;11:1387268. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1387268. eCollection 2024.
5
Revisiting nitrates use in pre-shock state of contemporary cardiogenic shock classification.重新审视当代心源性休克分类中休克前期状态下硝酸盐的使用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 4;10:1173168. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1173168. eCollection 2023.
6
Nitroglycerin use and adverse clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.硝酸甘油在老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的使用与不良临床结局。
Open Heart. 2024 Jan 11;11(1):e002494. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002494.
7
Mechanism of heart failure after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后心力衰竭的机制。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231202573. doi: 10.1177/03000605231202573.
8
Comparison of clinical outcomes of angiotensin receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction.比较急性心肌梗死患者使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的临床疗效。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0290251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290251. eCollection 2023.
9
Role of Magnesium in the Intensive Care Unit and Immunomodulation: A Literature Review.镁在重症监护病房中的作用及免疫调节:文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;11(6):1122. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061122.
10
Ethnic Disparities in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outcomes and Processes of Care in Patients With and Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Nationwide Cohort Study.伴有和不伴有标准可改变心血管危险因素的患者在ST段抬高型心肌梗死结局及医疗过程中的种族差异:一项全国性队列研究
Angiology. 2024 Sep;75(8):742-753. doi: 10.1177/00033197231182555. Epub 2023 Jun 12.