Suppr超能文献

What is optimum neck dissection for T3/4 buccal-gingival cancers?

作者信息

Pradhan S A, D'Cruz A K, Gulla R I

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Head and Neck Surgery), Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Bombay, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;252(3):143-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00178100.

Abstract

Buccal-gingival (BG) cancers are an integral part of oral cancers but are biologically distinct, particularly with regard to the propensity and pattern of neck metastases. This study was undertaken to examine the adequacy of limited neck dissection in the management of these tumors. Between 1980 and 1989, 527 T3/4 BG cancers were treated surgically at Tata Memorial Hospital, Bombay. These cases were reviewed retrospectively. Among these, 178 underwent radical neck dissection (RND), 166 supradigastric dissection (SD) and 183 supraomohyoid dissection (SOHD) after confirming the negativity of levels II and III for nodal disease on frozen section. The overall incidence of histological node positivity was 42.5% (224/527). Level I was the most frequent site of metastases, with a skip rate of only 9%. The incidence of pure regional failure (primary controlled) was 3% with RND (67/178), 12% with SD (11/95) and 5% with SOHD (7/141) in patients with N0 necks. In the N+ category the regional failure was 18% with RND (20/111), 34% with SD (24/71) and 19% with SOHD (8/42). These findings show that a limited (SD) dissection is grossly inadequate in the management of T3/4 BG cancers, whereas an SOHD when neck levels II and III are confirmed negative on frozen section yields results comparable to RND for both N0 and N+ necks.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验