Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, Naylor C D
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Loeb Medical Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594.
To assess the feasibility and impact of introducing the Ottawa ankle rules to a large number of physicians in a wide variety of hospital and community settings over a prolonged period of time.
Multicentre before and after controlled clinical trial.
Emergency departments of eight teaching and community hospitals in Canadian communities (population 10,000 to 3,000,000).
All 12,777 adults (6288 control, 6489 intervention) seen with acute ankle injuries during two 12 month periods before and after the intervention.
More than 200 physicians of varying experience were taught to order radiography according to the Ottawa ankle rules.
Referral for ankle and foot radiography.
There were significant reductions in use of ankle radiography at all eight hospitals and within a priori subgroups: for all hospitals combined 82.8% control v 60.9% intervention(P < 0.001); for community hospitals 86.7% v 61.7%; (P < 0.001); for teaching hospitals 77.9% v 59.9%; (P < 0.001); for emergency physicians 82.1% v 61.6%; (P < 0.001); for family physicians 84.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001); and for housestaff 82.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without fracture who had radiography during the intervention period those who had no radiography spent less time in the emergency department (54.0 v 86.9 minutes; P < 0.001) and had lower medical charges ($70.20 v $161.60; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of fractures diagnosed after discharge from the emergency department (0.5 v 0.4%).
Introduction of the Ottawa ankle rules proved to be feasible in a large variety of hospital and community settings. Use of the rules over a prolonged period of time by many physicians of varying experience led to a decrease in ankle radiography, waiting times, and costs without an increased rate of missed fractures. The multiphase methodological approach used to develop and implement these rules may be applied to other clinical problems.
评估在较长一段时间内,将渥太华踝关节规则引入众多不同医院和社区环境中的医生的可行性及影响。
多中心前后对照临床试验。
加拿大社区的八家教学医院和社区医院的急诊科(人口10,000至3,000,000)。
在干预前后两个12个月期间因急性踝关节损伤就诊的所有12,777名成年人(6288名对照,6489名干预组)。
对200多名经验各异的医生进行培训,使其根据渥太华踝关节规则开具X光检查单。
踝关节和足部X光检查的转诊情况。
所有八家医院以及预先设定的亚组中,踝关节X光检查的使用均显著减少:所有医院综合起来,对照组为82.8%,干预组为60.9%(P<0.001);社区医院分别为86.7%和61.7%(P<0.001);教学医院分别为77.9%和59.9%(P<0.001);急诊科医生分别为82.1%和61.6%(P<0.001);家庭医生分别为84.3%和60.1%(P<0.001);住院医生分别为82.3%和60.1%(P<0.001)。与干预期间接受X光检查但未骨折的患者相比,未接受X光检查的患者在急诊科停留的时间更短(54.0分钟对86.9分钟;P<0.001),医疗费用更低(70.20美元对161.60美元;P<0.001)。急诊科出院后诊断出的骨折率没有差异(0.5%对0.4%)。
在众多不同的医院和社区环境中,引入渥太华踝关节规则被证明是可行的。不同经验的众多医生在较长时间内使用这些规则,导致踝关节X光检查、等待时间和费用减少,同时未增加漏诊骨折的发生率。用于制定和实施这些规则的多阶段方法学可应用于其他临床问题。