Brand D A, Frazier W H, Kohlhepp W C, Shea K M, Hoefer A M, Ecker M D, Kornguth P J, Pais M J, Light T R
N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604.
To help curb excessive radiography, we developed a protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-ray examination, and we tested the protocol prospectively in 848 patients to determine its safety and effectiveness. Strict adherence to the protocol would have reduced x-ray usage by 12 per cent for upper extremities and 19 per cent for lower extremities. The actual reductions were 5 per cent and 16 per cent, respectively, since further reductions were limited by patient's demands for x-ray examinations. One fracture in 287 were missed, but the treatment was appropriate and the outcome satisfactory. By eliminating superfluous x-ray procedures, the protocol could reduce charges by $79 million to $139 million nationwide, without compromising quality of care or increasing malpractice liability. Nevertheless, even the best protocol cannot eliminate all negative x-ray studies. These results should serve as a stimulus for judicious use of radiography, but also as a warning to avoid overzealous cost-containment strategies that would reduce x-ray usage to below a safe threshold.
为了帮助控制过度的X线检查,我们制定了一项针对需要进行X线检查的四肢受伤患者的筛选方案,并对848例患者进行了前瞻性测试,以确定其安全性和有效性。严格遵守该方案可使上肢X线检查使用率降低12%,下肢降低19%。实际降低率分别为5%和16%,因为进一步降低受到患者对X线检查需求的限制。287例中有1例骨折漏诊,但治疗恰当,结果令人满意。通过消除多余的X线检查程序,该方案在全国范围内可减少7900万至1.39亿美元的费用,而不会影响医疗质量或增加医疗事故责任。然而,即使是最好的方案也无法消除所有不必要的X线检查。这些结果应促使人们明智地使用X线检查,同时也应作为一个警示,避免过度热心的成本控制策略,以免将X线检查使用率降至安全阈值以下。