Lukaszewska I, Niewiadomska G
Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 Jan;63(1):43-53. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1004.
We examined the performance of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar normotensive (NT) rats in acquisition, retention after a 2-month interval, and reversal learning in two tasks: simultaneous brightness discrimination (Experiment I) and conditional discrimination of directional locomotor responses (Experiment II). In both tasks food reinforcement was used. In Experiment I both SHR and NT groups comprised younger (3-month-old) and older (10-month-old) rats. In each experimental stage SHRs of both age groups mastered the task earlier and made fewer errors than the respective NT groups. Reversal learning took longer than acquisition of discrimination in both age groups of NT rats. Conversely, reversal learning was an easier task for SHR. In Experiment II only younger rats were used. The forced turn at the start in the modified T-maze was utilized as the cue to guide performance at the choice point of the maze. In acquisition and retention, rats were trained to select at the choice point the arm in the same direction as in the forced turn; in the reversal, opposite contingencies were applied. At all stages the choice accuracy of SHR was the same as that in NT rats. The contrasting findings of Experiment I and Experiment II indicate that SHR learned better than NT when exteroceptive visual stimuli were used, but performed at the same level as NT rats in the task where interoceptive kinesthetic cues were relevant. We suggest that SHR pay more attention to visual stimuli than NT rats.
我们研究了自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)和Wistar正常血压大鼠(NT)在两项任务中的习得、间隔2个月后的记忆保持以及逆向学习表现:同时亮度辨别(实验I)和定向运动反应的条件辨别(实验II)。两项任务均采用食物强化。在实验I中,SHR组和NT组均包括较年轻(3个月大)和较年长(10个月大)的大鼠。在每个实验阶段,两个年龄组的SHR比相应的NT组更早掌握任务且犯错更少。NT大鼠的两个年龄组中,逆向学习比辨别学习耗时更长。相反,逆向学习对SHR来说是一项更容易的任务。在实验II中仅使用了较年轻的大鼠。改良T型迷宫起始处的强制转向被用作线索,以引导大鼠在迷宫选择点的表现。在习得和记忆保持阶段,训练大鼠在选择点选择与强制转向方向相同的臂;在逆向学习中,则应用相反的条件。在所有阶段,SHR的选择准确性与NT大鼠相同。实验I和实验II的对比结果表明,当使用外感受性视觉刺激时,SHR比NT大鼠学得更好,但在与内感受性动觉线索相关的任务中,其表现与NT大鼠处于同一水平。我们认为,与NT大鼠相比,SHR更关注视觉刺激。