Radimský M
Psychiatrická klinika LF MU, Brno.
Cesk Psychiatr. 1995 May;91(2):75-81.
The article deals with experience assembled during prestructured interviews with a sample of ambulatory psychiatric patients. The author draws attention to the fact that the sample of patients was little aware of the fact of mandatory medical secret and thus unable to make use of advantages that a significant source of escape of information is medical documentation in the widest sense of the word. Conversely, the trend of social changes will, no doubt, lead to extension and more detailed information of the patient on the nature and prognosis of his disease, as it is the case in advanced countries, whereby the patient will be entitled to decide to whom and to what extent these data on his person will be provided. In future it will be necessary, by developing the legal consciousness of the public, to make people aware of the fact that secrecy on revealed facts is one of the basic legal prerequisites of work in the health services and that the provision of any information to subjects, authorities or institutions without the patient's consent or without restrictions defined by law is not permissible.
本文论述了在对一批门诊精神病患者进行结构化访谈过程中积累的经验。作者提请注意这样一个事实,即患者样本对强制医疗保密这一事实知之甚少,因此无法利用广义上的医疗记录这一重要信息来源所带来的优势。相反,社会变革的趋势无疑将导致患者对其疾病的性质和预后了解得更多、更详细,就像在发达国家那样,届时患者将有权决定这些关于其个人的数据将提供给何人以及提供到何种程度。未来,有必要通过提高公众的法律意识,让人们认识到对所披露事实保密是医疗服务工作的基本法律前提之一,未经患者同意或未依法定限制向对象、当局或机构提供任何信息是不允许的。