J Clin Oncol. 1995 Sep;13(9):2417-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.9.2417.
To evaluate antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of granisetron, dexamethasone, and their combination over repeated courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, and the influence of the prognostic factors on occurrence of nausea and vomiting.
Four hundred twenty-eight consecutive cancer patients were entered onto a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to compare granisetron 3 mg intravenously, dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously, and 4 mg orally every 6 hours for four doses, or the combination of dexamethasone plus granisetron at the same doses, administered for three consecutive cycles. Occurrence of nausea, retching, and vomiting was monitored for 24 hours after chemotherapy administration by a diary card.
Three hundred ninety-eight patients were assessable for clinical efficacy at the first cycle, 354 were assessable at the second cycle, and 322 were assessable at the third cycle of chemotherapy. Dexamethasone plus granisetron induced significantly greater complete protection from vomiting, nausea, and both nausea and vomiting than granisetron alone in all three cycles. With respect to dexamethasone alone, complete protection from vomiting was significantly greater at the first and second cycle, and complete protection from nausea and from both nausea and vomiting only at the first cycle. Complete protection did not differ significantly among the three cycles in patients receiving dexamethasone plus granisetron or dexamethasone alone, whereas it decreased significantly, at least for vomiting, in patients receiving granisetron alone. Protection obtained in the previous cycle of chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor in the occurrence of nausea and vomiting.
The combination of dexamethasone plus granisetron offers the best antiemetic protection because of its greater efficacy with respect to the other two regimens at first cycle, and because its activity is maintained in the subsequent cycles of chemotherapy.
评估格拉司琼、地塞米松及其联合用药在中度致吐性化疗重复疗程中的止吐疗效和耐受性,以及预后因素对恶心和呕吐发生的影响。
428例连续的癌症患者进入一项多中心、随机、双盲研究,比较静脉注射3毫克格拉司琼、静脉注射8毫克地塞米松以及每6小时口服4毫克地塞米松共四剂,或相同剂量的地塞米松加格拉司琼联合用药,连续给药三个周期。化疗给药后24小时通过日记卡监测恶心、干呕和呕吐的发生情况。
在化疗的第一个周期,398例患者可评估临床疗效;第二个周期,354例可评估;第三个周期,322例可评估。在所有三个周期中,地塞米松加格拉司琼诱导的完全预防呕吐、恶心以及恶心和呕吐的效果均显著优于单独使用格拉司琼。就单独使用地塞米松而言,在第一个和第二个周期完全预防呕吐的效果显著更好,仅在第一个周期完全预防恶心以及恶心和呕吐的效果显著更好。接受地塞米松加格拉司琼或单独使用地塞米松的患者在三个周期中完全预防效果无显著差异,而单独接受格拉司琼治疗的患者至少在呕吐方面完全预防效果显著下降。上一周期化疗获得的预防效果是恶心和呕吐发生的最重要预后因素。
地塞米松加格拉司琼联合用药提供了最佳的止吐保护,因为它在第一个周期相对于其他两种方案疗效更佳,且在后续化疗周期中其活性得以维持。