Suppr超能文献

社区中心绞痛的治疗:药物治疗有机会吗?

Treatment of angina pectoris in the community: is medical therapy given a chance?

作者信息

Kee F, Gaffney B, Canavan C, Little J, McConnell W, Telford A M, Watson J D

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Northern Health and Social Services Board, Ballymena.

出版信息

Public Health. 1995 Jul;109(4):259-66. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80203-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the routine management of patients with chronic stable angina by GPs in Northern Ireland and the factors which they perceived affected the success of medical therapy.

DESIGN

A questionnaire survey of all general practitioners in Northern Ireland (n = 962).

SETTING

A survey conducted collaboratively by the Departments of Public Health Medicine in each of the four Health Boards in the province. Total population served, 1.5 million.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The relationship between the perceived reasons for medical treatment failure and the stated referral and prescribing practice of the GPs.

RESULTS

A total of 541 GPs replied; the response rate was 56%. The two most important reasons given for the perceived failure of medical therapy were (i) underlying disease progression and (ii) an adverse patient lifestyle such as smoking or obesity (cited as of primary importance by (i) 264 and (ii) 225 doctors respectively). The ranking differed significantly according to the doctor's propensity to prescribe triple therapy, with those doctors in the highest tertile of this distribution being less likely to cite the patient's lifestyle as a primary reason for treatment failure (chi-squared = 6.7, d.f. = 2, P = 0.035) and more likely to cite underlying disease progression as a primary reason (chi-square = 7.0, d.f. = 2, p = 0.031). The overall ranking of the primary reasons for referral differed significantly according to the proportion of patients given a trial of triple therapy and to the doctor's propensity to refer. Doctors who had given a greater proportion of their patients at least a trial of triple therapy (in the highest tertile of the distribution) were more likely to cite the need for revascularisation assessment as the primary reason (chi-square = 12.5, d.f. = 2, P = 0.0019). On the other hand, the need for further advice on medical therapy was generally ranked higher by those doctors who had given fewer of their patients at least a trial of triple therapy (chi-square = 7.3, d.f. = 2, P = 0.027). GPs who had referred fewer of their new patients to hospital were more likely to be those doctors with fewer patients given at least a trial of triple therapy. Doctors with a greater percentage of their patients managed primarily by a hospital specialist tended to have more who had had a trial of triple therapy for their symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest the need for clearer definition for GPs of the place of revascularisation and of medical therapy for patients with stable angina.

摘要

目的

描述北爱尔兰全科医生对慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的常规管理,以及他们认为影响药物治疗成功的因素。

设计

对北爱尔兰所有全科医生(共962名)进行问卷调查。

背景

由该省四个健康委员会的公共卫生医学部门联合开展的一项调查。服务总人口为150万。

主要观察指标

药物治疗失败的感知原因与全科医生所述的转诊和开药实践之间的关系。

结果

共有541名全科医生回复;回复率为56%。药物治疗失败的两个最重要原因是:(i)基础疾病进展,(ii)患者不良生活方式,如吸烟或肥胖(分别有264名和225名医生认为这是首要原因)。根据医生开具三联疗法的倾向,排名有显著差异,处于该分布最高三分位数的医生不太可能将患者生活方式作为治疗失败的首要原因(卡方检验=6.7,自由度=2,P=0.035),而更可能将基础疾病进展作为首要原因(卡方检验=7.0,自由度=2,P=0.031)。根据接受三联疗法试验的患者比例和医生的转诊倾向,转诊的主要原因的总体排名有显著差异。给予更大比例患者至少一次三联疗法试验(处于分布最高三分位数)的医生更可能将血管重建评估的必要性作为首要原因(卡方检验=12.5,自由度=2,P=0.0019)。另一方面,对于给予较少患者至少一次三联疗法试验的医生来说,药物治疗进一步建议的必要性通常排名更高(卡方检验=7.3,自由度=2,P=0.027)。将较少新患者转诊至医院的全科医生更可能是给予较少患者至少一次三联疗法试验的医生。主要由医院专科医生管理的患者比例较高的医生,其症状接受三联疗法试验的患者往往更多。

结论

结果表明,需要为全科医生更明确地界定血管重建以及稳定型心绞痛患者药物治疗的地位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验