Suppr超能文献

聚乙醇酸缝线、胶原蛋白缝线和丝线在眼科手术中的对比试验。

Comparative trial of Dexon (polyglycolic acid), collagen, and silk sutures in ophthalmic surgery.

作者信息

Chatterjee S

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1975 Dec;59(12):736-40. doi: 10.1136/bjo.59.12.736.

Abstract

The tissue reaction, absorption, and handling properties of Dexon synthetic absorbable sutures, which are made from polymerized hydroxyacetic acid, were compared with those of silk and collagen in 51 eye operations, consisting mainly of cataract extractions and squint corrections. There was no significant difference between the sutures as regards degree of tissue reaction. The Dexon sutures were very strong and the knots held well. The sizes used in this series were found to be a little too thick and stiff for use in micro-surgery; smaller sizes would be easier to use and still remain strong enough. The Dexon was reliably absorbed in 5 weeks on average. No serious adverse reactions were seen with any of the sutures. Dexon was as well tolerated as the control sutures but had the advantage over silk of being absorbed and over collagen of containing no foreign protein.

摘要

在51例主要包括白内障摘除术和斜视矫正术的眼科手术中,对由聚合羟基乙酸制成的德克松合成可吸收缝线的组织反应、吸收和操作特性,与丝线和胶原缝线进行了比较。就组织反应程度而言,这些缝线之间没有显著差异。德克松缝线非常牢固,打结效果良好。本系列中使用的尺寸对于显微手术来说有点太粗太硬;较小的尺寸会更易于使用,并且仍然足够牢固。德克松平均在5周内可靠地被吸收。任何一种缝线均未出现严重不良反应。德克松与对照缝线一样耐受良好,但相对于丝线具有可吸收的优点,相对于胶原缝线具有不含异体蛋白的优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b4/1017446/4019426b6eae/brjopthal00264-0052-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验