Laplace E, Bénéfice S, Marti Flich J, Patrigeon R G, Combourieu E
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon.
Cah Anesthesiol. 1995;43(2):205-8.
This prospective study aimed to evaluate in 849 patients the Mallampati and Wilson scores for predicting a difficult intubation. All scheduled patients were included. Induction and tracheal intubation were carried out as usual. Intubation was deemed to have been difficult if any special procedure had been required (external compression excepted); difficult laryngoscopy was defined as grade 3 or 4 on the Cormack-Lehane scale. In accordance with these criteria, less than 36% of patients with difficult intubation or laryngoscopy were detected, with a high false positive rate (more than 75%) but a good negative predictive value (more than 90%). This study was not concordant with the results of the original studies. However, data from literature show a great variability of results between studies. Many factors may contribute to this variability: differences between samples of patients, evaluation of Mallampati or Wilson scale, protocols of induction and intubation or characterization of difficult intubation. This study suggests a poor reliability of the two tests.
这项前瞻性研究旨在评估849例患者的马兰帕蒂(Mallampati)评分和威尔逊(Wilson)评分对预测困难插管的价值。所有计划内的患者均被纳入研究。诱导和气管插管按常规进行。若需要任何特殊操作(不包括外部压迫),则判定插管困难;困难喉镜检查定义为科马克-莱哈尼(Cormack-Lehane)分级3级或4级。根据这些标准,仅检测出不到36%的插管困难或喉镜检查困难患者,假阳性率较高(超过75%),但阴性预测值良好(超过90%)。本研究结果与原始研究结果不一致。然而,文献数据显示各研究结果差异很大。许多因素可能导致这种差异:患者样本差异、马兰帕蒂评分或威尔逊评分的评估、诱导和插管方案或困难插管的特征描述。本研究表明这两项检查的可靠性较差。