Suppr超能文献

[困难气道插管:Mallampati和Wilson试验的前瞻性评估]

[Difficult intubation: a prospective evaluation of the Mallampati and Wilson tests].

作者信息

Laplace E, Bénéfice S, Marti Flich J, Patrigeon R G, Combourieu E

机构信息

Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon.

出版信息

Cah Anesthesiol. 1995;43(2):205-8.

PMID:7671089
Abstract

This prospective study aimed to evaluate in 849 patients the Mallampati and Wilson scores for predicting a difficult intubation. All scheduled patients were included. Induction and tracheal intubation were carried out as usual. Intubation was deemed to have been difficult if any special procedure had been required (external compression excepted); difficult laryngoscopy was defined as grade 3 or 4 on the Cormack-Lehane scale. In accordance with these criteria, less than 36% of patients with difficult intubation or laryngoscopy were detected, with a high false positive rate (more than 75%) but a good negative predictive value (more than 90%). This study was not concordant with the results of the original studies. However, data from literature show a great variability of results between studies. Many factors may contribute to this variability: differences between samples of patients, evaluation of Mallampati or Wilson scale, protocols of induction and intubation or characterization of difficult intubation. This study suggests a poor reliability of the two tests.

摘要

这项前瞻性研究旨在评估849例患者的马兰帕蒂(Mallampati)评分和威尔逊(Wilson)评分对预测困难插管的价值。所有计划内的患者均被纳入研究。诱导和气管插管按常规进行。若需要任何特殊操作(不包括外部压迫),则判定插管困难;困难喉镜检查定义为科马克-莱哈尼(Cormack-Lehane)分级3级或4级。根据这些标准,仅检测出不到36%的插管困难或喉镜检查困难患者,假阳性率较高(超过75%),但阴性预测值良好(超过90%)。本研究结果与原始研究结果不一致。然而,文献数据显示各研究结果差异很大。许多因素可能导致这种差异:患者样本差异、马兰帕蒂评分或威尔逊评分的评估、诱导和插管方案或困难插管的特征描述。本研究表明这两项检查的可靠性较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验