Bradley B P, Mogg K, Millar N, White J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, England.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Aug;104(3):532-6. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.3.532.
Anxious patients (n = 20) and normal controls (n = 20) carried out a modified Stroop color-naming task with anxiety- and depression-related words in supraliminal and subliminal exposure conditions. Within the anxious group, patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) without concurrent depression (n = 11) showed more color-naming interference for anxiety words than neutral words in comparison with patients with a combined diagnosis of GAD and depression (n = 9). Compared with controls, the GAD subgroup without concurrent depression showed slower color naming for negative than neutral words, in both supraliminal and subliminal conditions, replicating K. Mogg, B. P. Bradley, R. Williams, and A. Mathews's (1993) results. These findings provide further evidence of an anxiety-related bias for negative information in preconscious processes and highlight the importance of assessing concurrent depression.
焦虑患者(n = 20)和正常对照组(n = 20)在阈上和阈下暴露条件下,对与焦虑和抑郁相关的词汇进行了改良的Stroop颜色命名任务。在焦虑组中,未并发抑郁的广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者(n = 11)与同时患有GAD和抑郁的患者(n = 9)相比,对焦虑词汇的颜色命名干扰比对中性词汇的干扰更大。与对照组相比,未并发抑郁的GAD亚组在阈上和阈下条件下,对负面词汇的颜色命名都比对中性词汇慢,这重复了K. 莫格、B. P. 布拉德利、R. 威廉姆斯和A. 马修斯(1993年)的研究结果。这些发现为前意识过程中对负面信息的焦虑相关偏向提供了进一步证据,并突出了评估并发抑郁的重要性。