Marks G B, Tovey E R, Green W, Shearer M, Salome C M, Woolcock A J
Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1994 Nov;24(11):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb02746.x.
To test the effectiveness of a house dust mite (HDM) allergen avoidance strategy we conducted a randomized controlled trial in 35 atopic subjects with asthma, aged 13 to 60 living in Sydney - a high HDM allergen environment. After a 3 month run-in period, subjects were randomized to active allergen avoidance treatment (n = 17) or placebo (n = 18) groups and followed for 6 months. The active treatment involved placing impermeable covers over the mattress, pillows and duvet and spraying the remaining bedding, as well as the carpets and furniture, with a tannic acid/acaricidal spray. Subjects kept a daily record of symptoms and peak expiratory flow rates and had 3 monthly assessments of lung function and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Dust samples were collected from the bed, the bedroom floor and the living room floor at 3 monthly intervals and 2 weeks after the treatment. Mean HDM allergen levels at baseline at these sites were, in the active group, 15.5, 9.6 and 10.2 micrograms Der p I/g of fine dust, and, in the placebo group 25.7, 11.8 and 6.3 micrograms/g. Two weeks after the allergen avoidance treatment the HDM allergen level in the beds was reduced to 29% of baseline (95% CI 16-50%, P = 0.038 compared with placebo), but was not significantly different at 3 or 6 months. There was also no significant effect of the allergen avoidance treatment on symptom scores, peak flow variability, lung function or AHR P > 0.1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了测试屋尘螨(HDM)变应原回避策略的有效性,我们在悉尼(一个HDM变应原高暴露环境)对35名年龄在13至60岁的患有哮喘的特应性受试者进行了一项随机对照试验。经过3个月的导入期后,受试者被随机分为主动变应原回避治疗组(n = 17)或安慰剂组(n = 18),并随访6个月。主动治疗包括在床垫、枕头和羽绒被上覆盖防渗罩,并对其余床上用品、地毯和家具喷洒单宁酸/杀螨喷雾剂。受试者每天记录症状和呼气峰值流速,并每3个月评估一次肺功能和气道高反应性(AHR)。在治疗后2周以及每隔3个月从床、卧室地板和客厅地板采集灰尘样本。在这些部位,主动治疗组基线时的平均HDM变应原水平分别为每克细尘中含15.5、9.6和10.2微克Der p I,安慰剂组分别为25.7、11.8和6.3微克/克。变应原回避治疗2周后,床上的HDM变应原水平降至基线的29%(95%CI 16 - 50%,与安慰剂组相比P = 0.038),但在3个月或6个月时无显著差异。变应原回避治疗对症状评分、峰值流速变异性、肺功能或AHR也没有显著影响(P>0.1)。(摘要截短至250字)