Shane B S, Gutenmann W H, Lisk D J
Institute for Environmental Studies, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803.
Mutat Res. 1993 Jan;301(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(93)90054-y.
Incineration of municipal solid waste as an alternative to its disposal in landfills has advantages such as volume reduction and generation of energy. However, both air emissions and the residual ash may pose environmental and human health hazards. The Ames mutagenicity assay was used to determine the mutagenicity of fly and bottom ash from two incinerators over time. This assay is an alternative to costly and time-consuming chemical analyses and is more realistic for the assessment of the best disposition of the ash i.e. whether it could pose a risk to handlers of the ash, whether it can be used in cement or as a fertilizer or whether it should be relegated to a landfill. The mutagenic potency of fly and bottom ash on a per g weight basis of material is similar. Furthermore, the variability over time in mutagenicity indicates that constant monitoring of incineration products and byproducts is essential.
将城市固体废物进行焚烧以替代填埋处理具有体积减小和能源产生等优点。然而,废气排放和残余灰渣都可能对环境和人类健康构成危害。利用埃姆斯致突变试验来测定来自两座焚烧炉的飞灰和底灰随时间变化的致突变性。该试验是一种替代昂贵且耗时的化学分析的方法,对于评估灰渣的最佳处置方式更为实际,即它是否会对灰渣处理人员构成风险,是否可用于水泥或作为肥料,或者是否应被运往垃圾填埋场。基于每克材料重量计算,飞灰和底灰的致突变效力相似。此外,致突变性随时间的变化表明,对焚烧产物和副产物进行持续监测至关重要。