Ibrahim G K, Kerns B J, MacDonald J A, Ibrahim S N, Kinney R B, Humphrey P A, Robertson C N
Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Urol. 1993 Jan;149(1):170-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36032-9.
To investigate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) presence in the prostate, monoclonal antibody (clone EGFR1) immunohistochemical examination of radical prostatectomy specimens was performed (n = 37). All prostatic specimens contained benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and/or dysplasia (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or PIN), as well as prostatic carcinoma (CaP). Areas of dysplasia were further categorized as to the basal cell layer and the luminal cell area. BPH, PIN, and CaP tissues in each specimen were analyzed by a single observer and graded on a scale from 0-4+. Fifteen samples were also analyzed for EGFr content utilizing a Cell Analysis Systems (CAS 200) image cytometer. EGFr immunoreactivity of BPH basal cells was significantly higher than EGFr immunoreactivity in areas of CaP (p < 0.001). EGFr staining of BPH basal cells was also significantly higher than that seen in PIN luminal cells (p < 0.001). Immunoreactivity of EGFr in PIN basal cells was significantly higher than in PIN luminal cells (p < 0.001). EGFr staining of basal cells in BPH tissues was higher than that seen in the PIN basal cell layer but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). The amount of staining present in PIN luminal cells was also significantly greater than in CaP tissues (p = 0.002). Quantitative image analysis utilizing the CAS 200 image cytometer was performed on BPH and CaP areas exclusively. EGFr immunoreactivity in basal cells of the BPH tissues was significantly greater than that seen in CaP tissues (p < 0.001). The decreased EGFr immunoreactivity in CaP may reflect a differentiating role for EGFr in normal tissues. Loss of EGFr influence may be associated with an increased proliferative state in PIN and CaP. Destruction or alteration of the epidermal grwoth factor receptor by a protease, such as prostatic specific antigen, may also explain our findings. At the present time the meaning of the different amounts of EGFr in the various types of prostate tissues is unknown.
为研究前列腺中表皮生长因子受体(EGFr)的存在情况,对37例前列腺根治术标本进行了单克隆抗体(克隆EGFR1)免疫组化检查。所有前列腺标本均包含良性前列腺增生(BPH)和/或发育异常(前列腺上皮内瘤变或PIN)以及前列腺癌(CaP)。发育异常区域进一步分为基底细胞层和管腔细胞区域。由一名观察者对每个标本中的BPH、PIN和CaP组织进行分析,并按0至4+分级。还使用细胞分析系统(CAS 200)图像细胞仪对15个样本的EGFr含量进行了分析。BPH基底细胞的EGFr免疫反应性显著高于CaP区域的EGFr免疫反应性(p < 0.001)。BPH基底细胞的EGFr染色也显著高于PIN管腔细胞中的染色(p < 0.001)。PIN基底细胞中EGFr的免疫反应性显著高于PIN管腔细胞(p < 0.001)。BPH组织中基底细胞的EGFr染色高于PIN基底细胞层,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。PIN管腔细胞中的染色量也显著高于CaP组织(p = 0.002)。仅对BPH和CaP区域进行了使用CAS 200图像细胞仪的定量图像分析。BPH组织基底细胞中的EGFr免疫反应性显著高于CaP组织(p < 0.001)。CaP中EGFr免疫反应性的降低可能反映了EGFr在正常组织中的分化作用。EGFr影响的丧失可能与PIN和CaP中增殖状态的增加有关。蛋白酶(如前列腺特异性抗原)对表皮生长因子受体的破坏或改变也可能解释我们的发现。目前,各种类型前列腺组织中不同量EGFr的意义尚不清楚。