Seidman A D, Scher H I, Gabrilove J L, Bajorin D F, Motzer R J, O'Dell M, Curley T, Dershaw D D, Quinlivan S, Tao Y
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):408-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.408.
This study was undertaken to define an escalated dose schedule of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (E-MVAC) with hematopoietic growth-factor support, to define the ability to deliver E-MVAC with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) on 21- and 14-day schedules, and to assess the ability of rhG-CSF to maintain dose-intensity over four cycles of chemotherapy.
Twenty-three patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium received E-MVAC in a phase I investigation. Patients were treated on an every-21-day (n = 19) or every-14-day schedule of administration (n = 4), with rhG-CSF support. Delivered dose-intensity was calculated at the completion of four cycles of therapy relative to the planned administration of conventional MVAC (relative dose-intensity [RDI]). Peripheral-blood progenitor cell kinetics in these patients were studied prospectively.
Overall, the delivered RDI was 33% higher than the previously reported delivered dose-intensity of MVAC without hematopoietic support (140% for doxorubicin, 51% for cisplatin). Dose-intensity was well maintained through three cycles of therapy, after which leukopenia and thrombocytopenia became dose-limiting. Sixty-nine percent of patients with measurable disease responded, four (25%) with complete remissions. In five patients treated beyond the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), a 50- to 200-fold increase in G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), and interleukin-3 (IL-3)-responsive peripheral-blood progenitor cells over baseline was observed after 9 days of rhG-CSF administration.
These findings demonstrate the feasibility and limitations of dose intensification of M-VAC with rhG-CSF. While the overall impact of the increased drug administration can only be assessed in randomized comparisons, the results of the present trial suggest that escalations of the components of the four-drug regimen are unlikely to improve significantly the outcome for patients with advanced urothelial tract tumors.
本研究旨在确定在造血生长因子支持下甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(E-MVAC)的递增剂量方案,确定在21天和14天方案中使用重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)给予E-MVAC的能力,并评估rhG-CSF在四个化疗周期中维持剂量强度的能力。
23例尿路上皮移行细胞癌患者在一项I期研究中接受了E-MVAC治疗。患者按照每21天(n = 19)或每14天的给药方案(n = 4)接受治疗,并给予rhG-CSF支持。在四个治疗周期结束时,相对于计划给予的传统MVAC计算实际给药剂量强度(相对剂量强度[RDI])。对这些患者的外周血祖细胞动力学进行了前瞻性研究。
总体而言,实际RDI比先前报道的无造血支持的MVAC给药剂量强度高33%(阿霉素为140%,顺铂为51%)。在三个治疗周期中剂量强度得到了良好维持,之后白细胞减少和血小板减少成为剂量限制因素。69%的可测量疾病患者有反应,4例(25%)完全缓解。在5例接受超过最大耐受剂量(MTD)治疗的患者中,rhG-CSF给药9天后,观察到G-CSF、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)和白细胞介素-3(IL-3)反应性外周血祖细胞比基线增加了50至200倍。
这些发现证明了用rhG-CSF强化M-VAC剂量的可行性和局限性。虽然增加药物给药的总体影响只能在随机对照中评估,但本试验结果表明,四联药物方案各成分的增加不太可能显著改善晚期尿路上皮肿瘤患者的预后。