Glascoe F P, Byrne K E
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1993 Apr;32(4):203-8. doi: 10.1177/000992289303200402.
Timely provision of early developmental intervention depends on accurate developmental screening tests. The Developmental Profile-II (DP-II) relies on parent report to assess children from birth to 7 years old. One of its subtests, the Academic scale, is designed for developmental screening. To test its accuracy in detecting children with problems, the scale was administered to parents of 94 children between 6 and 75 months old. Each child was also given a battery of tests, such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. The Academic scale detected only 21% of the 19 children thus determined as having developmental problems, while 85% of the nondiagnosed children received normal or advanced scores on DP-II. Analysis revealed that DP-II scoring criteria are far too lenient and that many items are poorly placed in relation to age expectations. Alternative cutoff scores greatly improved sensitivity. DP-II is a potentially accurate measure that needs updating and restandardizing. Alternative tests include the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test.
及时提供早期发育干预依赖于准确的发育筛查测试。《发育量表第二版》(DP-II)依靠家长报告来评估从出生到7岁的儿童。其一个子测试“学业量表”是用于发育筛查的。为测试其在检测有问题儿童方面的准确性,该量表被施用于94名6至75个月大儿童的家长。每个孩子还接受了一系列测试,如贝利婴儿发展量表和斯坦福-比奈智力量表。学业量表仅检测出19名经判定有发育问题儿童中的21%,而85%未被诊断出问题的儿童在DP-II上获得了正常或超前分数。分析表明,DP-II的评分标准过于宽松,而且许多项目在与年龄预期的相关性方面设置不当。替代性的临界分数极大地提高了敏感性。DP-II是一种有潜在准确性的测量工具,但需要更新和重新标准化。替代性测试包括《明尼苏达儿童发展量表》和《巴特尔发育量表筛查测试》。