Angelotti T P, Macdonald R L
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-1687.
J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1429-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01429.1993.
Recent experimental evidence has led to the hypothesis that GABAA receptor channel (GABAR) heterogeneity or receptor channel subtypes may occur by differential assembly of a given set of subunits into various configurations. Alternatively, assembly of subunits into mature GABARs may arise from an ordered process to produce a preferred form of the receptor channel, as seen for nicotinic ACh receptors. In the preceding article, we demonstrated that transient expression of GABAR alpha 1 and beta 1 subunits in mouse L929 fibroblast cells produced two different types of GABARs, when coexpressed with and without the gamma 2S subunit. Not only did these GABARs differ in their GABA and diazepam pharmacology, but initial single-channel recordings suggested that the two types of GABARs (alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S) had different conductance and gating properties. It also appeared that alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs were preferentially formed over alpha 1 beta 1 GABARs, but it was not completely shown if both forms of GABARs were produced when a cell expressed all three subunits. To characterize further the assembly process and determine the preferred form, if it existed, it was necessary to obtain a kinetic "fingerprint" for both alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs. Thus, single-channel patch-clamp recording and kinetic analysis of receptor channel gating were performed. For both alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs, GABA evoked single-channel openings to both a main conductance (15 and 29 pS, respectively) and a subconductance level (10 and 21 pS, respectively) with greater than 90% of the total current through the main conductance level openings. The two GABAR populations were further differentiated by their open and burst properties. On average, alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs opened for almost three times the duration as alpha 1 beta 1 GABARs (6.0 vs 2.3 msec, respectively) and had three openings per burst. alpha 1 beta 1 GABARs opened predominantly as single opening bursts. Using the conductance and gating properties to differentiate the two GABAR populations, we determined that alpha 1 beta 1 GABARs were rarely, if ever, formed upon coexpression of all three subunits, suggesting that alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs were the preferred final form of the receptor channel. Also, the homogeneity of the conductance and gating properties of alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2S GABARs among the different patches studied implied that a single preferred configuration of GABARs may exist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
最近的实验证据提出了这样一种假说,即GABAA受体通道(GABAR)的异质性或受体通道亚型可能是由一组特定的亚基以不同的组合方式组装成各种构型而产生的。或者,亚基组装成成熟的GABAR可能源于一个有序的过程,以产生受体通道的一种优选形式,就像烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体那样。在上一篇文章中,我们证明,当在小鼠L929成纤维细胞中瞬时表达GABARα1和β1亚基时,无论是否与γ2S亚基共表达,都会产生两种不同类型的GABAR。这些GABAR不仅在GABA和地西泮药理学方面存在差异,而且最初的单通道记录表明,这两种类型的GABAR(α1β1和α1β1γ2S)具有不同的电导和门控特性。似乎α1β1γ2S GABAR比α1β1 GABAR更易优先形成,但当细胞表达所有三个亚基时,是否会产生这两种形式的GABAR尚未完全明确。为了进一步表征组装过程并确定优选形式(如果存在的话),有必要获得α1β1和α1β1γ2S GABAR的动力学“指纹”。因此,我们进行了单通道膜片钳记录和受体通道门控的动力学分析。对于α1β1和α1β1γ2S GABAR,GABA均能诱发单通道开放至一个主要电导水平(分别为15和29 pS)和一个亚电导水平(分别为10和21 pS),总电流的90%以上通过主要电导水平的开放。这两种GABAR群体在开放和爆发特性上进一步有所区别。平均而言,α1β1γ2S GABAR的开放持续时间几乎是α1β1 GABAR的三倍(分别为6.0毫秒和2.3毫秒),每次爆发有三次开放。α1β1 GABAR主要以单次开放爆发的形式开放。利用电导和门控特性来区分这两种GABAR群体,我们确定,当所有三个亚基共表达时,α1β1 GABAR极少形成,这表明α1β1γ2S GABAR是受体通道的优选最终形式。此外,在研究的不同膜片中,α1β1γ2S GABAR的电导和门控特性的同质性意味着可能存在一种单一的GABAR优选构型。(摘要截选至400字)