Stevens D B, Swanborg R H
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201.
J Neuroimmunol. 1993 May;44(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90040-6.
Spleen cells (SpC) from Lewis rats that have recovered from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) confer protection against EAE to naive syngeneic recipients if transferred directly (without culture), but transfer EAE if first activated in culture in the presence of myelin basic protein (MBP) antigen. In order to test the hypothesis that both effector (Te) and suppressor (Ts) cells of EAE coexist in recovered rats, but only the Te proliferate in culture in response to MBP, bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) was added to the culture and dividing cells were killed by exposure to light prior to adoptive transfer. Recipients of BUdR+light-treated cells did not develop EAE, showing that Te were deleted by the treatment. In contrast, Ts activity persisted because these recipients were protected against EAE when challenged with an encephalitogenic dose of MBP.
已从实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE)中恢复的Lewis大鼠的脾细胞(SpC),若直接转移(不经培养),可使同基因未致敏受体免受EAE侵害,但如果在髓鞘碱性蛋白(MBP)抗原存在的情况下先在培养中激活,则会转移EAE。为了验证EAE的效应细胞(Te)和抑制细胞(Ts)在恢复的大鼠中同时存在,但只有Te在培养中对MBP产生增殖反应这一假设,在培养中加入了溴脱氧尿苷(BUdR),并在过继转移前通过光照杀死正在分裂的细胞。接受经BUdR + 光照处理细胞的受体未发生EAE,表明Te被该处理消除。相比之下,Ts活性持续存在,因为这些受体在用致脑炎性剂量的MBP攻击时可免受EAE侵害。