文献检索，用中文搜 PubMed

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究

Hunter G R, Chang F C

J Trauma. 1976 Mar;16(3):191-5.

There is no significant difference in overall wound healing rates between non-antibacterial and antibacterial impregnated dressings used in this study. 2) The burn wound is not sterile. 3) Ease of dressing removal was similar during the first 7 days; thereafter the nitrofurazone dressings were more adherent; however, patient acceptance as subjectively evaluated at the time of dressing change and from the description of intervals between dressing changes did not vary significantly between the two dressings. 4) Pathogenic flora, both gram-positive and gram-negative, were significantly less prevalent in wounds treated with nitrofurazone dressings when the closed technique for burn treatment was utilized.

在本研究中使用的非抗菌敷料和含抗菌剂的敷料之间，总体伤口愈合率没有显著差异。2) 烧伤创面并非无菌。3) 在最初7天内，两种敷料的去除难易程度相似；此后，呋喃西林敷料的粘连性更强；然而，根据换药时的主观评估以及从换药间隔时间的描述来看，患者对两种敷料的接受度并无显著差异。4) 当采用烧伤封闭治疗技术时，使用呋喃西林敷料治疗的伤口中，革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性致病菌群的流行率显著更低。

Hunter G R, Chang F C

J Trauma. 1976 Mar;16(3):191-5.

There is no significant difference in overall wound healing rates between non-antibacterial and antibacterial impregnated dressings used in this study. 2) The burn wound is not sterile. 3) Ease of dressing removal was similar during the first 7 days; thereafter the nitrofurazone dressings were more adherent; however, patient acceptance as subjectively evaluated at the time of dressing change and from the description of intervals between dressing changes did not vary significantly between the two dressings. 4) Pathogenic flora, both gram-positive and gram-negative, were significantly less prevalent in wounds treated with nitrofurazone dressings when the closed technique for burn treatment was utilized.

在本研究中使用的非抗菌敷料和含抗菌剂的敷料之间，总体伤口愈合率没有显著差异。2) 烧伤创面并非无菌。3) 在最初7天内，两种敷料的去除难易程度相似；此后，呋喃西林敷料的粘连性更强；然而，根据换药时的主观评估以及从换药间隔时间的描述来看，患者对两种敷料的接受度并无显著差异。4) 当采用烧伤封闭治疗技术时，使用呋喃西林敷料治疗的伤口中，革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性致病菌群的流行率显著更低。