Xia R, Odemuyiwa O, Gill J, Malik M, Camm A J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1993 May;32(3-4):223-35. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(93)90016-y.
Spectral methods for the assessment of heart rate variability (HRV) in 24-h electrocardiograms (ECG) are believed to require visual verification and manual editing of the computerised recognition of the ECG. This study investigated the effect of the recognition errors of computerised ECG recognition on two methods providing spectral HRV indices: (a) Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT); and (b) peak-to-trough analysis (PTA). Both methods were used to measure HRV spectra in 24-h ECGs recorded in 557 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Each ECG was analysed using the Marquette 8000 Holter system and spectral HRV analyses were performed both prior to and after manual verification of the automatic ECG analysis. The FFT and PTA methods were used to calculate the low (0.04-0.15 Hz), medium (0.15-0.40 Hz) and high (0.40-1.00 Hz) HRV spectral components. For each method and for each spectral component, the rank correlations between the results obtained from unedited and edited ECG recognition were calculated. The correlations between the corresponding spectral components provided by the FFT and PTA methods applied to the edited recognitions were also calculated. Both methods were substantially affected by recognition errors. The FFT method was more sensitive to the misrecognition than the PTA method. The inter-method correlations were higher for the high and medium spectral components than for the low spectral component. The study suggests that spectral HRV analysis should be performed only on carefully verified and manually corrected recognitions of long-term electrocardiograms.
用于评估24小时心电图(ECG)中心率变异性(HRV)的频谱方法被认为需要对ECG的计算机识别结果进行视觉验证和人工编辑。本研究调查了计算机化ECG识别中的识别错误对两种提供频谱HRV指标的方法的影响:(a)快速傅里叶变换(FFT);以及(b)峰谷分析(PTA)。这两种方法都用于测量557例急性心肌梗死幸存者记录的24小时ECG中的HRV频谱。使用Marquette 8000动态心电图系统对每份ECG进行分析,并在自动ECG分析的人工验证前后进行频谱HRV分析。FFT和PTA方法用于计算低(0.04 - 0.15Hz)、中(0.15 - 0.40Hz)和高(0.40 - 1.00Hz)HRV频谱成分。对于每种方法和每个频谱成分,计算未编辑和编辑后的ECG识别结果之间的等级相关性。还计算了应用于编辑后的识别结果的FFT和PTA方法提供的相应频谱成分之间的相关性。两种方法都受到识别错误的显著影响。FFT方法比PTA方法对误识别更敏感。高、中频谱成分的方法间相关性高于低频谱成分。该研究表明,频谱HRV分析应仅在对长期心电图进行仔细验证和人工校正的识别结果上进行。