Nakamura H, Gattass R, Desimone R, Ungerleider L G
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Neurosci. 1993 Sep;13(9):3681-91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03681.1993.
In addition to the major anatomical pathways from V1 into the temporal lobe, there are other smaller, "bypass" routes that are poorly understood. To investigate the direct projection from V1 to V4 (bypassing V2) and from V2 to TEO (bypassing V4), we injected the foveal and parafoveal representations of V4 and TEO with different retrograde tracers in five hemispheres of four macaques and analyzed the distributions of labeled neurons in V1 and V2 using flattened preparations of the cortex. In V1, labeled neurons were seen after injections in V4 but not TEO. The V4-projecting neurons were located in the foveal representation of V1, in both cytochrome oxidase (CO)-rich blobs and CO-poor interblob regions. In V2, TEO-projecting neurons were intermingled with V4-projecting neurons, although the former were far sparser than the latter. Across the cases, 6-19% of the TEO-projecting neurons were double labeled, that is, also projected to area V4. Both V4- and TEO-projecting neurons formed bands that ran orthogonal to the V1/V2 border, and both were located in CO-rich thin stripes and CO-poor interstripe regions. In some cases, a continuous band of V4-projecting neurons was also found along the V1/V2 border in the foveal representation of V2. The results indicate that the pathways from V1 to V4 and from V2 to TEO involve anatomical subcompartments thought to be concerned with both color and form. These "bypass" routes may allow coarse information about color and form to arrive rapidly in the temporal lobe. The bypass route from V2 to TEO might explain the partial sparing of color and form vision that is seen after lesions of V4. By analogy, given the bypass route from the foveal representation of V1 to V4, lesions of V2 affecting the foveal visual field would also be insufficient to block color and form vision.
除了从V1到颞叶的主要解剖学通路外,还有其他较小的、人们了解甚少的“旁路”路径。为了研究从V1到V4(绕过V2)以及从V2到TEO(绕过V4)的直接投射,我们在4只猕猴的5个大脑半球中,用不同的逆行示踪剂分别注射到V4和TEO的中央凹和中央凹周围代表区,并使用皮质的扁平化标本分析V1和V2中标记神经元的分布。在V1中,注射到V4后可见标记神经元,但注射到TEO后未见。投射到V4的神经元位于V1的中央凹代表区,在富含细胞色素氧化酶(CO)的斑点和CO含量低的斑点间区域均有。在V2中,投射到TEO的神经元与投射到V4的神经元相互交织,尽管前者比后者稀疏得多。在所有病例中,6% - 19%的投射到TEO的神经元被双重标记,即也投射到V4区。投射到V4和TEO的神经元均形成与V1/V2边界正交的条带,且均位于富含CO的细条带和CO含量低的条带间区域。在某些情况下,在V2的中央凹代表区的V1/V2边界处也发现了一条连续的投射到V4的神经元带。结果表明,从V1到V4以及从V2到TEO的通路涉及被认为与颜色和形状都有关的解剖学亚区。这些“旁路”路径可能使关于颜色和形状的粗略信息迅速到达颞叶。从V2到TEO的旁路路径可能解释了V4损伤后所见的颜色和形状视觉的部分保留。同理,鉴于从V1的中央凹代表区到V4的旁路路径,影响中央凹视野的V2损伤也不足以阻断颜色和形状视觉。