Clements W D, Diamond T, McCrory D C, Rowlands B J
Department of Surgery, Queen's University of Belfast, UK.
Br J Surg. 1993 Jul;80(7):834-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800707.
Jaundiced patients undergoing invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are at increased risk of complications and death. Despite the large number of clinical and experimental investigations carried out to identify relevant risk factors, no single parameter has been found to be consistently useful in predicting morbidity or mortality. Biliary decompression was initially employed by surgeons and subsequently by interventional radiologists. More recently, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has provided an alternative route for decompression of the biliary tree and preliminary data using this method are encouraging. Although there are enthusiastic proponents of various therapeutic techniques, controlled trials have not been convincing in highlighting the benefits of biliary drainage or in determining the best approach. This article reviews the literature pertaining to this complex surgical problem; an attempt has been made to balance the advantages and disadvantages of biliary decompression as palliation and/or preliminary treatment for extrahepatic biliary obstruction.
接受侵入性诊断和治疗程序的黄疸患者发生并发症和死亡的风险增加。尽管为确定相关风险因素进行了大量临床和实验研究,但尚未发现单一参数能始终如一地用于预测发病率或死亡率。外科医生最初采用胆道减压术,随后介入放射科医生也采用该方法。最近,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术为胆道树减压提供了另一种途径,使用该方法的初步数据令人鼓舞。尽管各种治疗技术都有热情的支持者,但对照试验在突出胆道引流的益处或确定最佳方法方面并不令人信服。本文回顾了与这个复杂外科问题相关的文献;已尝试权衡胆道减压作为肝外胆道梗阻的姑息治疗和/或初步治疗的利弊。