Balzarini J, Karlsson A, Pérez-Pérez M J, Camarasa M J, De Clercq E
Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Virology. 1993 Oct;196(2):576-85. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1513.
Treatment of HIV-1-infected cells with the HIV-1-specific inhibitors hydroxyethoxymethylphenylthiothymine (HEPT), tetrahydroimidazobenzodiazepinones (TIBO), nevirapine, pyridinone, bis(heteroaryl)piperazines (BHAP), and tert-butyldimethylsilylspiroaminooxathioledioxide (TSAO) at a concentration of 0.1 microgram/ml resulted in a rapid breakthrough of resistant virus within three to four subcultivations. At drug concentrations of 0.5 to 1 microgram/ml, emergence of resistant virus was delayed. The drug-resistant HIV-1 strains that originated under these conditions were genetically and phenotypically characterized and showed differential sensitivities against the different classes of HIV-1-specific inhibitors depending on the amino acid substitutions in their reverse transcriptase. Novel amino acid substitutions were found in the reverse transcriptase of BHAP- and pyridinone-resistant mutant HIV-1 strains that had not been reported so far. At 2.5 to 10 micrograms/ml, that is at a concentration 100- to 250-fold higher than the 50% effective concentration (EC50), HEPT, TIBO, nevirapine, pyridinone, and BHAP prevented virus breakthrough after 15 subcultivations. In contrast, 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxythymidine (AZT), even when administered at a 1000-fold higher concentration (i.e., 1.3 micrograms/ml) than its EC50 failed to prevent virus breakthrough after the second subcultivation. HIV-1-infected cell cultures could apparently be cleared from virus by the HIV-1-specific inhibitors when used at the "knocking-out" concentrations (2.5-10 micrograms/ml), as evidenced by (i) the lack of viral cytopathicity, (ii) the lack of virus-specific envelope glycoprotein expression, (iii) the lack of viral p24 antigen production, and (iv) the apparent absence of proviral DNA in the cells. Moreover, uninfected CEM cell cultures to which HIV-1-infected CEM cells (including syncytia) had been added were protected from destruction by high-concentration treatment with the HIV-1-specific inhibitors, but not with AZT and DDI (2',3'-dideoxyinosine).
用浓度为0.1微克/毫升的HIV-1特异性抑制剂羟乙氧基甲基苯基硫代胸腺嘧啶(HEPT)、四氢咪唑并苯二氮杂卓酮(TIBO)、奈韦拉平、吡啶酮、双(杂芳基)哌嗪(BHAP)和叔丁基二甲基甲硅烷基螺氨基氧硫代二氧化物(TSAO)处理HIV-1感染的细胞,在三到四次传代培养内导致耐药病毒迅速突破。在药物浓度为0.5至1微克/毫升时,耐药病毒的出现延迟。在这些条件下产生的耐药HIV-1毒株进行了基因和表型特征分析,根据其逆转录酶中的氨基酸取代情况,对不同类别的HIV-1特异性抑制剂表现出不同的敏感性。在BHAP和吡啶酮耐药的突变HIV-1毒株的逆转录酶中发现了迄今尚未报道的新氨基酸取代。在2.5至10微克/毫升,即比50%有效浓度(EC50)高100至250倍的浓度下,HEPT、TIBO、奈韦拉平、吡啶酮和BHAP在15次传代培养后可防止病毒突破。相比之下,3'-叠氮-2',3'-双脱氧胸腺嘧啶核苷(AZT),即使以比其EC50高1000倍的浓度(即1.3微克/毫升)给药,在第二次传代培养后仍未能防止病毒突破。当以“敲除”浓度(2.5 - 10微克/毫升)使用HIV-1特异性抑制剂时,HIV-1感染的细胞培养物显然可以从病毒中清除,这表现为:(i)缺乏病毒细胞病变效应;(ii)缺乏病毒特异性包膜糖蛋白表达;(iii)缺乏病毒p24抗原产生;(iv)细胞中明显不存在前病毒DNA。此外,添加了HIV-1感染的CEM细胞(包括多核巨细胞)的未感染CEM细胞培养物,通过用HIV-1特异性抑制剂进行高浓度处理可免受破坏,但用AZT和双脱氧肌苷(DDI)处理则不能。