• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小学生幽默技能分析:有智力障碍和无智力障碍儿童的比较。

Analysis of humor skills among elementary school students: comparisons of children with and without intellectual handicaps.

作者信息

Short E J, Basili L A, Schatschneider C W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.

出版信息

Am J Ment Retard. 1993 Jul;98(1):63-73.

PMID:7690574
Abstract

Differences in the comprehension, production, and appreciation of humor were explored among students who were achieving normally (20 second graders, 21 fourth graders) or had learning disabilities (14 fourth graders) or developmental handicaps (12 fourth graders). Comprehension of humor was assessed by explanations of what made cartoons funny. Production was assessed by completion of captionless cartoons. Appreciation was evaluated by ratings of funniness and facial mirth. Results indicated that children without handicaps comprehended the cartoons better than did the students with intellectual handicaps. No production differences were observed. Students who had intellectual handicaps demonstrated age-appropriate appreciation ratings; however, students with developmental handicaps lacked differential sensitivity.

摘要

在学业成绩正常的学生(20名二年级学生、21名四年级学生)、有学习障碍的学生(14名四年级学生)或发育障碍的学生(12名四年级学生)中,对幽默理解、创作和欣赏的差异进行了探究。幽默理解通过对卡通片有趣之处的解释来评估。创作通过完成无字幕卡通片来评估。欣赏通过对有趣程度和面部欢笑的评分来评价。结果表明,没有障碍的儿童比有智力障碍的学生对卡通片理解得更好。未观察到创作方面的差异。有智力障碍的学生表现出符合年龄的欣赏评分;然而,有发育障碍的学生缺乏差异敏感性。

相似文献

1
Analysis of humor skills among elementary school students: comparisons of children with and without intellectual handicaps.小学生幽默技能分析:有智力障碍和无智力障碍儿童的比较。
Am J Ment Retard. 1993 Jul;98(1):63-73.
2
Humour appreciation and comprehension in children with intellectual disability.智障儿童的幽默感欣赏和理解。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Jun;54(6):525-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01277.x.
3
The effects of normal aging on humor appreciation.正常衰老对幽默欣赏的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):855-63. doi: 10.1017/S135561770396005X.
4
Differences between humor comprehension and appreciation in healthy children and children with epilepsy.健康儿童与癫痫儿童在幽默理解与欣赏方面的差异。
J Child Neurol. 2012 Mar;27(3):310-8. doi: 10.1177/0883073811419259. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
5
Comprehension of humor in children with nonverbal learning disabilities, reading disabilities, and without learning disabilities.非言语学习障碍儿童、阅读障碍儿童以及无学习障碍儿童对幽默的理解
Ann Dyslexia. 2008 Dec;58(2):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s11881-008-0016-3. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
6
Development of a test battery (NPM-X) for neuropsychological and neuromotor examination of children with developmental disabilities or mental retardation. A theoretical and clinical study.用于发育障碍或智力迟钝儿童神经心理和神经运动检查的测试组合(NPM-X)的开发。一项理论与临床研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1997;390:1-55.
7
The labyrinth of IDEA: school decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence.IDEA的迷宫:学校对智力低于平均水平的转介学生的决策
Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Sep;101(2):161-74.
8
Perception of humor in cartoon riddles by adults with intellectual disability.智力障碍成年人对卡通谜语中幽默的感知
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Jun;78(3 Pt 1):817-8. doi: 10.1177/003151259407800326.
9
Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch recalls.提示方法会影响儿童对学校午餐回忆的准确性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):911-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00264-9.
10
Working memory functioning in children with learning disabilities: does intelligence make a difference?学习障碍儿童的工作记忆功能:智力会产生影响吗?
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Jan;53(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01105.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Humor in Social Interaction in People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review of the Literature.调查智力障碍者社交互动中的幽默:文献系统综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 21;9:1745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01745. eCollection 2018.