Suppr超能文献

两种用于终止室性心动过速的自适应起搏算法的随机交叉评估。

Randomized cross-over evaluation of two adaptive pacing algorithms for the termination of ventricular tachycardia.

作者信息

Kantoch M J, Green M S, Tang A S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1664-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01037.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In a randomized, cross-over study we evaluated the efficacy of rate adaptive constant cycle length (BURST) and autodecremental (RAMP) pacing for termination of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS

An external device capable of delivering the same types of antitachycardia pacing as the newer generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators was used. Thirty-one patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and documented clinical ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were examined during routine invasive electrophysiological studies. RAMP and BURST pacing were each attempted in 54 matched pairs of induced ventricular tachycardia. After a therapy was applied, the tachycardia was reinitiated and the other therapy applied during the second episode so that a total of 108 ventricular tachycardia episodes were studied.

RESULTS

Overall efficacy of ventricular tachycardia pace termination was 69% and the time required to stop ventricular tachycardia was 14.1 +/- 11.3 seconds. The ability to terminate ventricular tachycardia by RAMP (72%) or BURST (65%) pacing was not significantly different. However, time to terminate ventricular tachycardia by RAMP (11.8 +/- 8.5 sec) was significantly shorter than by BURST (16.4 +/- 13.5), P < .001. Acceleration of ventricular tachycardia was uncommon with both pacing modes, 7/108 (7%). The ability to pace terminate ventricular tachycardia was cycle length dependent. The highest success was with ventricular tachycardia cycle length between 300 and 350 msec. The success rate decreased with faster and also slower ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Rate adaptive pacing methods for ventricular tachycardia termination are effective and safe. 2. Autodecremental RAMP pacing afford quicker ventricular tachycardia termination than constant cycle length BURST pacing. 3. The ability to terminate ventricular tachycardia is cycle length dependent with cycle length range of 300-350 msec being most responsive to pace termination.
摘要

目的

在一项随机交叉研究中,我们评估了频率适应性固定周长(BURST)起搏和自动递减(RAMP)起搏对终止持续性单形性室性心动过速的疗效。

方法

使用一种能够提供与新一代植入式心脏复律除颤器相同类型抗心动过速起搏的外部设备。在常规侵入性电生理研究期间,对31例患有缺血性和非缺血性心肌病且记录有临床室性心动过速或心室颤动的患者进行了检查。在54对匹配的诱发室性心动过速中分别尝试了RAMP和BURST起搏。应用一种治疗方法后,重新诱发心动过速并在第二次发作时应用另一种治疗方法,因此总共研究了108次室性心动过速发作。

结果

室性心动过速起搏终止的总体有效率为69%,终止室性心动过速所需时间为14.1±11.3秒。RAMP(72%)或BURST(65%)起搏终止室性心动过速的能力无显著差异。然而,RAMP(11.8±8.5秒)终止室性心动过速的时间明显短于BURST(16.4±13.5秒),P<0.001。两种起搏模式下室性心动过速加速均不常见,为7/108(7%)。起搏终止室性心动过速的能力取决于周长。在室性心动过速周长为300至350毫秒时成功率最高。随着室性心动过速速度加快或减慢,成功率均降低。

结论

  1. 用于终止室性心动过速的频率适应性起搏方法有效且安全。2. 自动递减的RAMP起搏比固定周长的BURST起搏能更快地终止室性心动过速。3. 终止室性心动过速的能力取决于周长,周长范围为300 - 350毫秒时对起搏终止最敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验