Kantoch M J, Green M S, Tang A S
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Aug;16(8):1664-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01037.x.
In a randomized, cross-over study we evaluated the efficacy of rate adaptive constant cycle length (BURST) and autodecremental (RAMP) pacing for termination of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
An external device capable of delivering the same types of antitachycardia pacing as the newer generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators was used. Thirty-one patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and documented clinical ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were examined during routine invasive electrophysiological studies. RAMP and BURST pacing were each attempted in 54 matched pairs of induced ventricular tachycardia. After a therapy was applied, the tachycardia was reinitiated and the other therapy applied during the second episode so that a total of 108 ventricular tachycardia episodes were studied.
Overall efficacy of ventricular tachycardia pace termination was 69% and the time required to stop ventricular tachycardia was 14.1 +/- 11.3 seconds. The ability to terminate ventricular tachycardia by RAMP (72%) or BURST (65%) pacing was not significantly different. However, time to terminate ventricular tachycardia by RAMP (11.8 +/- 8.5 sec) was significantly shorter than by BURST (16.4 +/- 13.5), P < .001. Acceleration of ventricular tachycardia was uncommon with both pacing modes, 7/108 (7%). The ability to pace terminate ventricular tachycardia was cycle length dependent. The highest success was with ventricular tachycardia cycle length between 300 and 350 msec. The success rate decreased with faster and also slower ventricular tachycardia.
在一项随机交叉研究中,我们评估了频率适应性固定周长(BURST)起搏和自动递减(RAMP)起搏对终止持续性单形性室性心动过速的疗效。
使用一种能够提供与新一代植入式心脏复律除颤器相同类型抗心动过速起搏的外部设备。在常规侵入性电生理研究期间,对31例患有缺血性和非缺血性心肌病且记录有临床室性心动过速或心室颤动的患者进行了检查。在54对匹配的诱发室性心动过速中分别尝试了RAMP和BURST起搏。应用一种治疗方法后,重新诱发心动过速并在第二次发作时应用另一种治疗方法,因此总共研究了108次室性心动过速发作。
室性心动过速起搏终止的总体有效率为69%,终止室性心动过速所需时间为14.1±11.3秒。RAMP(72%)或BURST(65%)起搏终止室性心动过速的能力无显著差异。然而,RAMP(11.8±8.5秒)终止室性心动过速的时间明显短于BURST(16.4±13.5秒),P<0.001。两种起搏模式下室性心动过速加速均不常见,为7/108(7%)。起搏终止室性心动过速的能力取决于周长。在室性心动过速周长为300至350毫秒时成功率最高。随着室性心动过速速度加快或减慢,成功率均降低。