• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环状芽孢杆菌中可消化生淀粉淀粉酶的结构域结构和多样性:用蛋白酶K、Glu-C内切肽酶和嗜热菌蛋白酶进行广泛的蛋白水解作用

Domain structure and multiplicity of raw-starch-digesting amylase from Bacillus circulans: extensive proteolysis with proteinase K, endopeptidase Glu-C and thermolysin.

作者信息

Kim C H, Kho Y H

机构信息

Genetic Resources Center, Genetic Engineering Research Institute, K.I.S.T., Taejon, South Korea.

出版信息

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Oct 6;1202(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(93)90005-c.

DOI:10.1016/0167-4838(93)90005-c
PMID:7691184
Abstract

Raw-starch-digesting amylase (RSDA) is a key extracellular enzyme of mesophilic Bacillus circulans F-2 which uses raw starch granules as a carbon source. Previous work has demonstrated that there are two domains of the enzyme during digestion with subtilisin, and that RSDA activity is selectively inactivated by limited proteolysis with subtilisin, which cleaves the enzyme between these hydrolytic and adsorption domains (Kim, C.-H., Kwon, S.-T., Taniguchi, H. and Lee, D.-S. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1122, 243-250). In this work we show that a similar phenomenon is observed during limited proteinase K, thermolysin and endopeptidase Glu-C proteolysis of the enzyme. Fragments resulting from proteolysis were characterized by immunoblotting with anti-RSDA. The proteolytic patterns resulting from proteinase K and subtilisin were the same, producing 63 and 30-kDa fragments. Similar patterns were obtained with endopeptidase Glu-C or thermolysin. All proteolytic digests contained a common, major 63-kDa fragment. Inactivation of RSDA activity results from splitting off the C-terminal domain. Hence, it seems probable that the proteinase-sensitive locus is in a hinge region susceptible to cleavage. Extracellular enzymes immunoreactive towards anti-RSDA were detected through whole bacterial cultivation. 93, 75, 63, 55, 38 and 31-kDa proteins were immunologically identical to RSDA. Of these, the 75-kDa and 63-kDa proteins correspond to the major products of proteolysis with Glu-C and thermolysin. These results suggest that enzyme heterogeneity of the raw-starch hydrolysis system might arise from the endogenous proteolytic activity of the bacterium.

摘要

生淀粉消化淀粉酶(RSDA)是嗜温环状芽孢杆菌F-2的一种关键胞外酶,该菌利用生淀粉颗粒作为碳源。先前的研究表明,用枯草杆菌蛋白酶消化该酶时存在两个结构域,并且RSDA活性可通过枯草杆菌蛋白酶的有限蛋白水解作用而被选择性失活,枯草杆菌蛋白酶在这些水解和吸附结构域之间切割该酶(Kim,C.-H.,Kwon,S.-T.,Taniguchi,H.和Lee,D.-S.(1992年)《生物化学与生物物理学报》1122,243 - 250)。在本研究中,我们表明在用蛋白酶K、嗜热菌蛋白酶和内肽酶Glu-C对该酶进行有限蛋白水解时也观察到了类似现象。通过用抗RSDA进行免疫印迹对蛋白水解产生的片段进行了表征。蛋白酶K和枯草杆菌蛋白酶产生的蛋白水解模式相同,产生了63 kDa和30 kDa的片段。用内肽酶Glu-C或嗜热菌蛋白酶也获得了类似模式。所有蛋白水解消化产物都包含一个共同的主要63 kDa片段。RSDA活性的失活是由于C末端结构域的分离。因此,蛋白酶敏感位点似乎位于一个易受切割的铰链区域。通过全菌培养检测到了对抗RSDA有免疫反应的胞外酶。93、75、63、55、38和31 kDa的蛋白质与RSDA在免疫学上相同。其中,75 kDa和63 kDa的蛋白质对应于用Glu-C和嗜热菌蛋白酶进行蛋白水解的主要产物。这些结果表明,生淀粉水解系统的酶异质性可能源于细菌的内源性蛋白水解活性。

相似文献

1
Domain structure and multiplicity of raw-starch-digesting amylase from Bacillus circulans: extensive proteolysis with proteinase K, endopeptidase Glu-C and thermolysin.环状芽孢杆菌中可消化生淀粉淀粉酶的结构域结构和多样性:用蛋白酶K、Glu-C内切肽酶和嗜热菌蛋白酶进行广泛的蛋白水解作用
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Oct 6;1202(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(93)90005-c.
2
Proteolytic modification of raw-starch-digesting amylase from Bacillus circulans F-2 with subtilisin: separation of the substrate-hydrolytic domain and the raw substrate-adsorbable domain.用枯草杆菌蛋白酶对环状芽孢杆菌F-2的生淀粉消化淀粉酶进行蛋白水解修饰:底物水解结构域与天然底物吸附结构域的分离。
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Aug 21;1122(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90399-x.
3
Characterization of a DNA fragment carrying the raw starch-digesting alpha-amylase and salt-dependent alpha-amylase genes from Bacillus circulans F-2.
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Feb 15;126(2):133-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07406.x.
4
Chemical modification with phthalic anhydride and chitosan: Viable options for the stabilization of raw starch digesting amylase from Aspergillus carbonarius.邻苯二甲酸酐与壳聚糖的化学修饰:稳定来自炭黑曲霉的生淀粉消化淀粉酶的可行选择。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Jun;99:641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Production of raw-starch-digesting α-amylase isoform from Bacillus sp. under solid-state fermentation and biochemical characterization.芽孢杆菌固态发酵生产可消化生淀粉的α-淀粉酶同工型及其生化特性研究
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014 Jul;37(7):1353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00449-013-1105-1. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Improving the thermostability of raw-starch-digesting amylase from a Cytophaga sp. by site-directed mutagenesis.通过定点诱变提高噬纤维菌属菌株中可消化生淀粉淀粉酶的热稳定性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):2383-5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2383-2385.2003.
7
Cloning and expression of raw-starch-digesting alpha-amylase gene from Bacillus circulans F-2 in Escherichia coli.环状芽孢杆菌F-2中可消化生淀粉的α-淀粉酶基因在大肠杆菌中的克隆与表达
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Apr 6;1048(2-3):223-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(90)90060-f.
8
Stabilization of a raw-starch-digesting amylase by multipoint covalent attachment on glutaraldehyde-activated amberlite beads.通过多点共价附着在戊二醛活化的 Amberlite 珠上稳定原淀粉消化淀粉酶。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 May;22(5):628-36. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1108.08070.
9
Stabilization of a raw starch digesting amylase from Aspergillus carbonarius via immobilization on activated and non-activated agarose gel.通过固定在活化和非活化琼脂糖凝胶上稳定来自炭黑曲霉的生淀粉消化淀粉酶。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Jan;28(1):335-45. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0824-1. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Deletion analysis of the C-terminal region of the alpha-amylase of Bacillus sp. strain TS-23.芽孢杆菌属TS-23菌株α-淀粉酶C端区域的缺失分析
Arch Microbiol. 2002 Aug;178(2):115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00203-002-0431-5. Epub 2002 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization and substrate specificity of an endo-beta-1,4-D-glucanase I (Avicelase I) from an extracellular multienzyme complex of Bacillus circulans.环状芽孢杆菌胞外多酶复合物中内切-β-1,4-D-葡聚糖酶I(微晶纤维素酶I)的特性及底物特异性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):959-65. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.959-965.1995.