Castiñeiras J, López A, Ronco M A, Varo C, González D, Alvarez-Ossorio J L, Rodríguez-Rubio F
Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Cádiz.
Actas Urol Esp. 1993 Sep;17(8):508-12.
The present paper reviews our experience in the use of Wallstent prosthesis. We contribute a total of seven patients which presented with bulbar urethra stenosis (five cases) and benign prostate hyperplasia (two cases), all of which had undergone periodical dilation prior to the prosthesis implant as well as various endoscopic urethrotomies. Here, we report the indications, exclusion criteria, criteria for evaluation of results, and brief description of the technique or method used for the prosthesis implant. Finally, we report on the procedure's advantages and the need to conduct extensive studies (prospective and randomized) in order to clarify the place such prosthesis may take within the therapeutic field of stenosis of the urethra, and in benign prostate hyperplasia.
本文回顾了我们使用Wallstent假体的经验。我们共纳入了7例患者,其中5例为球部尿道狭窄,2例为良性前列腺增生,所有患者在植入假体前均接受了定期扩张以及各种内镜下尿道切开术。在此,我们报告了适应证、排除标准、结果评估标准,以及对假体植入所采用技术或方法的简要描述。最后,我们报告了该手术的优点,以及开展广泛研究(前瞻性和随机对照研究)以明确此类假体在尿道狭窄和良性前列腺增生治疗领域中地位的必要性。