• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌淋巴结水平的简单分类。

A simple classification of lymph node level in gastric carcinoma.

作者信息

Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Okuyama T, Kamakura T, Mori M, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1995 Apr;169(4):382-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80181-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80181-0
PMID:7694976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because insufficient lymph node examination can cause erroneous listing of earlier-nodal-stage gastric carcinoma (stage migration phenomenon), surgical results must be evaluated based on a highly accurate examination of the dissected lymph nodes. To establish a simple and useful classification of lymph node level, we analyzed the frequency and distribution of lymph node metastasis by using curatively treated node-positive gastric carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Various clinicopathologic data were analyzed with reference to the degree of lymph node metastasis by using 240 patients with curatively resected node-positive gastric carcinoma. The cases were divided into the following three groups: 142 with positive level I (perigastric) nodes, 71 with positive level II (intermediate) nodes, and 27 with positive level III (distant) nodes, irrespective of the location of tumors.

RESULTS

The level of lymph node metastasis clearly correlated with the survival of patients, with the 5-year survival rates for level I, II, and III cases being 67%, 35%, and 26%, respectively (P < 0.01). The degree of lymph node metastasis was determined by the number of positive nodes (P < 0.01), the depth of invasion (P < 0.01), the size of tumors (P < 0.01), and the location of tumors (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This simple classification of lymph node level (level I, II, and III) is useful for the evaluation and prediction of surgical results in gastric carcinoma.

摘要

背景

由于淋巴结检查不充分可能导致早期淋巴结分期的胃癌错误分期(分期迁移现象),因此必须基于对切除淋巴结的高度准确检查来评估手术结果。为了建立一种简单且有用的淋巴结水平分类方法,我们使用接受根治性治疗的淋巴结阳性胃癌患者分析了淋巴结转移的频率和分布。

患者与方法

参考淋巴结转移程度,对240例接受根治性切除的淋巴结阳性胃癌患者的各种临床病理数据进行了分析。这些病例分为以下三组:142例I级(胃周)淋巴结阳性,71例II级(中间)淋巴结阳性,27例III级(远处)淋巴结阳性,不考虑肿瘤位置。

结果

淋巴结转移水平与患者生存率明显相关,I级、II级和III级病例的5年生存率分别为67%、35%和26%(P<0.01)。淋巴结转移程度由阳性淋巴结数量(P<0.01)、浸润深度(P<0.01)、肿瘤大小(P<0.01)和肿瘤位置(P<0.05)决定。

结论

这种简单的淋巴结水平分类(I级、II级和III级)有助于评估和预测胃癌的手术结果。

相似文献

1
A simple classification of lymph node level in gastric carcinoma.胃癌淋巴结水平的简单分类。
Am J Surg. 1995 Apr;169(4):382-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80181-0.
2
Most important lymph node information in gastric cancer: multivariate prognostic study.胃癌最重要的淋巴结信息:多因素预后研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug;7(7):503-7. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0503-1.
3
Clinical results and prognostic factors of radiologically node-positive gastric carcinoma.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Mar;28(2):140-3. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199903000-00011.
4
[Clinical study on lymph node metastasis regularity in 1456 patients with gastric cancer].1456例胃癌患者淋巴结转移规律的临床研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1154-1160.
5
Carcinomatous infiltration into the submucosa as a predictor of lymph node involvement in early gastric cancer.
World J Surg. 1998 Oct;22(10):1056-9; discussion 1059-60. doi: 10.1007/s002689900516.
6
[Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma].[晚期胃癌淋巴结转移规律及主动脉旁淋巴结清扫对临床结局的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;9(1):17-22.
7
Analysis of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: rationale of limited surgery.早期胃癌淋巴结转移分析:有限手术的理论依据
J Surg Oncol. 1997 Jan;64(1):42-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199701)64:1<42::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-p.
8
Perigastric lymph node status as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.胃周淋巴结状态作为胃癌患者的预后指标
Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1281-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00833.x.
9
[Metastasis rates of lymph nodes and distribution in advanced gastric cancer and its clinical significance].[进展期胃癌淋巴结转移率及分布情况及其临床意义]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;9(6):506-9.
10
Lymph node metastasis in cancer of the middle-third stomach: criteria for treatment with a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.胃中上部癌的淋巴结转移:保留幽门胃切除术的治疗标准
Surg Today. 2001;31(3):196-203. doi: 10.1007/s005950170168.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease-specific mortality in gastric cancer-A competing risk analysis.胃癌疾病特异性死亡率的预处理列线图的开发和验证:竞争风险分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7561-7571. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4279. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
2
Lymph nodes may be a source for immunetherapy in gastric cancer.淋巴结可能是胃癌免疫治疗的一个来源。
Oncotarget. 2020 May 12;11(19):1729-1736. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27578.
3
Prognostic discrimination of subgrouping node-positive endometrioid uterine cancer: location vs nodal extent.
分组阳性子宫内膜样子宫癌的预后鉴别:位置与淋巴结累及范围。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Oct 11;105(8):1137-43. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.336. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
4
Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.胃癌的淋巴结分期:位置比数量更重要吗?对1038例患者的分析
Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):362-71. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00008.
5
Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: five-year survival rates in a multicenter randomized Italian trial. Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group.胃癌的胃次全切除术与全胃切除术:意大利一项多中心随机试验的五年生存率。意大利胃肠肿瘤研究组
Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):170-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00006.