Grimm M, Grimm G, Zuckermann A, Wieselthaler G, Feuerstein M, Daneschvar H, Schmiedinger H, Schreiner W, Wolner E, Laufer G
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Apr;59(4):916-20. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00013-b.
The impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy on survival of heart transplant candidates is of major socioeconomic and ethical interest. However, efficacy is even uncertain for patients at highest risk of tachyarrhythmic death on the waiting list. We studied 60 selected heart transplant candidates (mean age, 55.8 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.15; functional class III and IV) with a history of successful resuscitation by external electric defibrillation for spontaneous, syncopal ventricular tachyarrhythmia during the study period from March 1992 through September 1994. At the time of registration for transplantation, 30 patients had ICD devices implanted, whereas 30 patients lacked ICD therapy for various nonmedical reasons. Both therapy groups were comparable in clinical and hemodynamic characteristics as well as in intention to transplant (median waiting time to transplantation, 5.7 and 6 months, respectively; not significant by log-rank method). Survival on the waiting list was significantly improved by ICD therapy; only 1 of the 30 ICD patients (19 transplanted) but 7 of the 30 non-ICD patients (14 transplanted) died on the waiting list (p < 0.05 by log-rank method). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy did not affect survival after transplantation as compared with non-ICD patients (not significant by log-rank method). During the waiting time, 26 of the ICD patients (87%) experienced adequate ICD discharges, and 12 of the non-ICD patients were treated successfully by external electric defibrillation (40%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗对心脏移植候选者生存的影响具有重大的社会经济和伦理意义。然而,对于等待名单上发生快速心律失常死亡风险最高的患者,其疗效甚至尚不确定。我们研究了60例选定的心脏移植候选者(平均年龄55.8岁;平均左心室射血分数0.15;功能分级为III级和IV级),这些患者在1992年3月至1994年9月的研究期间有因自发性、晕厥性室性快速心律失常经体外电除颤成功复苏的病史。在登记移植时,30例患者植入了ICD装置,而30例患者因各种非医学原因未接受ICD治疗。两个治疗组在临床和血流动力学特征以及移植意向方面具有可比性(移植的中位等待时间分别为5.7个月和6个月;对数秩检验无显著差异)。ICD治疗显著改善了等待名单上的生存率;30例ICD患者中只有1例(19例接受了移植)在等待名单上死亡,而30例非ICD患者中有7例(14例接受了移植)在等待名单上死亡(对数秩检验p<0.05)。与非ICD患者相比,植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗对移植后的生存没有影响(对数秩检验无显著差异)。在等待期间,26例ICD患者(87%)经历了适当的ICD放电,12例非ICD患者经体外电除颤成功治疗(40%)。(摘要截短至250字)