Interpreting results of observational research. Problem with confounders can be tackled.
作者信息
Buck D, Sutton M
出版信息
BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1439.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Interpreting results of observational research. Problem with confounders can be tackled.解读观察性研究的结果。混杂因素问题可得到解决。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1439.
2
Using the E-Value to Assess the Potential Effect of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies.使用E值评估观察性研究中未测量混杂因素的潜在影响。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):602-603. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21554.
3
Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data.关于：前列腺癌治疗的比较效果：评估观察性数据中混杂因素的统计调整
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 17;103(16):1277. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr262. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
4
[Confounding factors and automatic selection of variables].
Med Clin (Barc). 2002 Sep 28;119(10):397. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)73428-3.
5
Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.在涉及观察性数据的重症监护健康服务研究中调整偏倚和混杂因素的方法。
J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.01.004.
6
Interpreting results of observational research. P values are still useful.解读观察性研究的结果。P值仍然有用。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1439a.
7
Adjusting results for confounding bias.针对混杂偏倚调整结果。
Acta Radiol. 2008 Sep;49(7):769-70. doi: 10.1080/02841850802136769.
8
Interpreting the results of observational research: chance is not such a fine thing.解读观察性研究的结果：机遇并非如此美好。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 17;309(6956):727-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6956.727.
9
A statistics primer.统计学基础。
Am J Sports Med. 1996 May-Jun;24(3):393-5. doi: 10.1177/036354659602400324.
10
Confounding: regression adjustment.混杂因素：回归调整。
Nutrition. 2006 May;22(5):581-3. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.02.004.
本文引用的文献
1
Interpreting the results of observational research: chance is not such a fine thing.解读观察性研究的结果：机遇并非如此美好。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 17;309(6956):727-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6956.727.
Zotero 插件