Handelsman H
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 1994 Oct(3):1-20.
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques are increasingly being used in addition to or in place of conventional x-ray angiography (CA) methods for studies of blood flow and blood vessel morphology. MRA has evolved from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for noninvasive visualization of blood flow and vasculature. MRI, aided by computers, generates images (angiograms) created by the contrast of flowing blood and the surrounding tissues; the magnetically depolarized flowing blood contrasts with the magnetically saturated stationary tissues, resulting in a differential high-signal intensity. MRA signals are MRI signals encoded with spatial data achieved by Fourier and echoplanar imaging, projection reconstruction, and spiral scanning. MRA's vasculature "flow map" incorporates both anatomic and physiologic information. This publication explores the history, principles, techniques (including time-of-flight and phase-contrast imaging), clinical applications, and indications and contraindications of MRA use. In addition, data on particular areas of study such as the head and neck and cerebral, thoracic, abdominal, and peripheral vasculature are provided. Two-and three-dimensional MRA methods are discussed, and comparisons are made between MRA and CA. Recommendations from several health service agencies and institutions are provided. Drawbacks, e.g., generally poorer resolution compared with CA, and restrictions of MRA use are discussed. Corollary studies with standard MRI or CA methods are sometimes advisable, and MRA alone is not always sufficient for comprehensive analysis of blood flow and blood vessel vasculature. MRA techniques have been developing in response to the hazards and limitations of CA; MRA involves no exposure to ionizing radiation and generally has a shorter information accrual time compared with conventional scans, in addition to being noninvasive and circumventing the systemic reactions sometimes caused by contrast agents in CA. Another advantage to MRA use is that it can be conducted in an outpatient setting, and many restrictions that apply to CA do not apply to MRA techniques. MRA is useful in detecting aneurysms, occlusions, and stenoses and is especially important in cases in which the use of contrast agents presents high risk. MRA is a promising technology for accurate and noninvasive evaluation of blood flow and blood vessel morphology. Though it cannot at present be considered a standard technique, it is gaining wider acceptance, especially in diagnoses of patients whose condition contraindicates standard angiography.
磁共振血管造影(MRA)技术越来越多地被用于补充或替代传统的X射线血管造影(CA)方法,以研究血流和血管形态。MRA是从磁共振成像(MRI)技术发展而来的,用于无创可视化血流和脉管系统。MRI在计算机的辅助下,通过流动血液与周围组织的对比生成图像(血管造影);磁性去极化的流动血液与磁性饱和的静止组织形成对比,产生差异高信号强度。MRA信号是通过傅里叶成像、回波平面成像、投影重建和螺旋扫描获得的带有空间数据编码的MRI信号。MRA的脉管系统“血流图”包含了解剖学和生理学信息。本出版物探讨了MRA的历史、原理、技术(包括时间飞跃法和相位对比成像)、临床应用以及使用MRA的适应证和禁忌证。此外,还提供了关于特定研究领域的数据,如头颈部以及脑、胸、腹和外周脉管系统。讨论了二维和三维MRA方法,并对MRA和CA进行了比较。提供了几个卫生服务机构和院校的建议。讨论了MRA的缺点,例如与CA相比分辨率通常较差,以及MRA使用的限制。有时建议采用标准MRI或CA方法进行补充研究,仅靠MRA并不总是足以全面分析血流和血管脉管系统。MRA技术是为应对CA的危害和局限性而发展起来的;MRA无需暴露于电离辐射,与传统扫描相比,通常信息采集时间更短,此外它是无创的,并且避免了CA中造影剂有时引起的全身反应。使用MRA的另一个优点是它可以在门诊进行,许多适用于CA的限制不适用于MRA技术。MRA在检测动脉瘤、闭塞和狭窄方面很有用,在使用造影剂存在高风险的情况下尤为重要。MRA是一种有前途的技术,可用于准确无创评估血流和血管形态。虽然目前它不能被视为一种标准技术,但它正获得更广泛的认可,尤其是在诊断那些病情禁忌标准血管造影的患者时。