Suppr超能文献

[通过P波触发信号平均心电图的时域分析预测阵发性心房颤动的标准]

[The criteria for the prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by time domain analysis of the P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram].

作者信息

Abe R, Nishida T

机构信息

3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Ohashi Hospital.

出版信息

Nihon Rinsho. 1995 Feb;53(2):496-502.

PMID:7699879
Abstract

In order to determine the criteria for definition of atrial late potentials in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Paf), the P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAE) was recorded in 88 patients with Paf (Paf group) and in 216 normal subjects (Normal group). Three SAE variables, duration of the filtered P wave (FPD), root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 msec (V20) and duration of under 5 microV (D5) of the vector magnitude were measured. FPD and D5 were significantly longer in the Paf than in the Normal group (FPD; 137 +/- 13 vs. 115 +/- 7 msec, D5; 27 +/- 12 vs. 16 +/- 5 msec, p < 0.001, respectively). V20 was also significantly lower in the Paf than in the Normal group (2.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.1 microV, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of Paf was computed (for all dichotomy points) and compared with various criteria for atrial late potentials based on the three SAE variables. Analysis showed that 1) FPD was a better predictor of Paf than the other two variables, 2) the criteria of [FPD > 125 msec and V20 = 3.0 microV or less] as defining "atrial late potentials" gave a sensitivity of 68%, a specificity of 99% and a predictive accuracy of 90%. These findings suggest that the SAE is useful to predict Paf. Additionally, prospective studies are needed with a larger number of patients to compare the different criteria of "atrial late potentials" by time domain analysis of the SAE.

摘要

为了确定阵发性心房颤动(Paf)患者心房晚电位的定义标准,对88例Paf患者(Paf组)和216例正常受试者(正常组)记录了P波触发的信号平均心电图(SAE)。测量了三个SAE变量,即滤波后P波的持续时间(FPD)、最后20毫秒的均方根电压(V20)和向量幅度低于5微伏的持续时间(D5)。Paf组的FPD和D5显著长于正常组(FPD:137±13毫秒对115±7毫秒,D5:27±12毫秒对16±5毫秒,p均<0.001)。Paf组的V20也显著低于正常组(2.5±1.1微伏对3.9±1.1微伏,p<0.001)。计算了预测Paf的敏感性和特异性(针对所有二分点),并与基于这三个SAE变量的心房晚电位的各种标准进行比较。分析表明:1)FPD对Paf的预测优于其他两个变量;2)[FPD>125毫秒且V20≤3.0微伏]作为定义“心房晚电位”的标准,敏感性为68%,特异性为99%,预测准确性为90%。这些发现表明SAE对预测Paf有用。此外,需要对更多患者进行前瞻性研究,以通过SAE的时域分析比较“心房晚电位”的不同标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验