• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据《美国残疾人法案》解决纠纷。一个背部有损伤的员工的案例。

Resolving disputes under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A case example of an employee with a back impairment.

作者信息

Blanck P D

机构信息

Annenberg Washington Program, University of Iowa, College of Law, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Apr 1;20(7):853-9.

PMID:7701403
Abstract

To illustrate the importance of proactive medical professional participation in Americans with Disabilities Act reasonable accommodation cases, this article describes the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques to resolve a case involving a blue collar employee with a work-related lower back injury. The problems in accommodating employees with back and spine injuries are being experienced by many employers. To date, the largest number of discrimination claims filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the Americans with Disabilities Act involve individuals with back and spine impairments. This article identifies eight decision-points in the Americans with Disabilities Act accommodation process that are relevant to employers, persons with disabilities, medical professionals, union representatives, and legal counsel.

摘要

为说明医疗专业人员积极参与《美国残疾人法案》合理便利案件的重要性,本文介绍了使用替代性纠纷解决技术来解决一起涉及一名患有与工作相关的下背部损伤的蓝领员工的案件。许多雇主都面临着为背部和脊柱受伤员工提供便利的问题。迄今为止,根据《美国残疾人法案》向平等就业机会委员会提出的歧视索赔中,数量最多的涉及背部和脊柱受损的个人。本文确定了《美国残疾人法案》便利程序中与雇主、残疾人、医疗专业人员、工会代表和法律顾问相关的八个决策点。

相似文献

1
Resolving disputes under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A case example of an employee with a back impairment.根据《美国残疾人法案》解决纠纷。一个背部有损伤的员工的案例。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Apr 1;20(7):853-9.
2
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. A primer of Title I provisions for occupational health care professionals.
J Occup Med. 1992 May;34(5):503-9.
3
The ADA at three years: a statute in flux.三年后的《美国残疾人法案》:一部不断变化的法规。
Employee Relat Law J. 1996 Spring;21(4):5-38.
4
Americans with Disabilities Act: meeting the requirements.
AAOHN J. 1992 Jun;40(6):284-6.
5
Americans With Disabilities Act.《美国残疾人法案》
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993 Jan-Feb;14(1):92-8.
6
EEOC is making quick work of AIDS job-bias litigation. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.美国平等就业机会委员会正在迅速处理艾滋病就业歧视诉讼案件。平等就业机会委员会。
AIDS Policy Law. 1995 Sep 8;10(16):6.
7
Psychiatric disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act: implications for policy and practice.精神疾病残疾与《美国残疾人法案》:对政策和实践的影响
J Health Soc Policy. 1998;10(3):1-12. doi: 10.1300/J045v10n03_01.
8
Chronic, recurrent low back pain. A methodology for analyzing fitness for duty and managing risk under the Americans with Disabilities Act.慢性复发性腰痛。一种根据《美国残疾人法案》分析工作适应性和管理风险的方法。
J Occup Med. 1994 May;36(5):537-47.
9
Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act. A case report on Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Oct 1;20(19):2161-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00017.
10
"Reasonable accommodation" under the Americans with Disabilities Act--what does it mean?《美国残疾人法案》中的“合理便利”——这是什么意思?
Employee Relat Law J. 1991 Spring;16(4):431-51.