Bock H A, Gallati H, Zürcher R M, Bachofen M, Mihatsch M J, Landmann J, Thiel G
Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Basel, Switzerland.
Transplantation. 1995 Mar 27;59(6):830-40.
We carried out a randomized prospective trial to compare OKT3 (5 mg/d, 51 patients) with ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F, 4 mg/kg/d, 53 patients) for induction therapy after renal transplantation, concerning side effects, rejection, and infection incidence within a one year follow-up period. Concomitant immunosuppression included azathioprine/steroids from day 0 and cyclosporine A from day 4. OKT3 patients experienced significantly more and more-severe side effects, particularly pyrexia, headache, and pulmonary fluid overload. One-year graft survival was excellent in the ATG-F group (91%), but only 78% in the OKT3 group (P < 0.05) due to a series of rejections that occurred beyond day 100; patient survival (96% and 92%) was similar in both groups. OKT3-treated patients experienced more biopsy-proven rejections (0.6 +/- 0.1/pt.) than ATG-F patients (0.3 +/- 0.1, P < 0.05), and there was a similar, albeit not significant trend in clinical rejections (OKT3: 1.1 +/- 0.2/pt.; ATG-F: 0.8 +/- 0.1/pt.). Infections were more common in the OKT3 group (OKT3: 3.2 +/- 0.3, ATG-F: 2.0 +/- 0.2, P < 0.05), although this was entirely attributable to "minor" infections. On days 1 through 6, CD3 counts were more profoundly depressed with OKT3 therapy. Beyond day 10, however, CD3 counts were lower in the ATG-F group, as were CD2 counts, CD4 counts, and the CD4/CD8 ratio, suggesting a more prolonged immunosuppressive effect of ATG-F. Sensitization occurred more frequently with OKT3 (31%) than with ATG-F (10%), but was usually irrelevant, except in two patients (one in each group), whose grafts were lost because of immunization against OKT3 and ATG-F, respectively. In conclusion, a 7-day induction therapy with OKT3 does not improve outcome or diminish immunological graft loss when compared with ATG-F, but is associated with more rejections, infections, and side effects. ATG-F appears to be preferable for induction immunosuppression after renal transplantation.
我们进行了一项随机前瞻性试验,比较肾移植后使用OKT3(5毫克/天,51例患者)与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白-费森尤斯(ATG-F,4毫克/千克/天,53例患者)进行诱导治疗时,在一年随访期内的副作用、排斥反应和感染发生率。从第0天开始的伴随免疫抑制包括硫唑嘌呤/类固醇,从第4天开始使用环孢素A。OKT3组患者出现的副作用明显更多且更严重,尤其是发热、头痛和肺水肿。ATG-F组的一年移植肾存活率极佳(91%),但OKT3组仅为78%(P<0.05),原因是100天后发生了一系列排斥反应;两组的患者存活率相似(分别为96%和92%)。经活检证实,接受OKT3治疗的患者排斥反应(0.6±0.1/患者)比接受ATG-F治疗的患者(0.3±0.1,P<0.05)更多,临床排斥反应也有类似趋势,尽管不显著(OKT3:1.1±0.2/患者;ATG-F:0.8±0.1/患者)。感染在OKT3组更常见(OKT3:3.2±0.3,ATG-F:2.0±0.2,P<0.05),不过这完全归因于“轻度”感染。在第1至6天,OKT3治疗使CD3计数下降更明显。然而,在第10天后,ATG-F组的CD3计数较低,CD2计数、CD4计数和CD4/CD8比值也较低,表明ATG-F的免疫抑制作用持续时间更长。OKT3组致敏发生率(31%)高于ATG-F组(10%),但通常无关紧要,除了两名患者(每组各一名),他们分别因针对OKT3和ATG-F的免疫反应而失去移植肾。总之,与ATG-F相比,7天的OKT3诱导治疗并不能改善预后或减少免疫性移植肾丢失,但会伴有更多排斥反应、感染和副作用。ATG-F似乎更适合用于肾移植后的诱导免疫抑制。