Rey J L, Deschamps-Berger P H, Tribouilloy C, Hermida J S, Kugener H, Jarry G, Marek A
Service de cardiologie A, Hôpital Sud, Amiens.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994 Jun;87(6):737-44.
The stroke volume (SV) was measured by the change in the impedance in thirteen patients with dual chamber pacemakers at different atrioventricular delay (AVD) intervals: 31 to 219 ms or 75 to 220 ms. The mitral inflow was also recorded by Doppler echocardiography at each AVD with measurement of the duration of mitral flow (MFD) and the velocity time integral (VTI). All thirteen patients were studied in the DDD mode; in addition, 5 patients were studied in the atrial sensing ventricular stimulation VDD mode. The SV measurement by impedance plethysmography was reproducible with an average variability of 3.5%: the optimal AVD was determined by this method in 11 patients with DDD and 4 patients with VDD pacing: in 3 patients (2 in DDD and 1 in VDD mode) 2 optimal AVD were obtained. The optimal AVD was 123 +/- 31 ms (63 to 156 ms) in DDD mode and 91 +/- 17 ms (63 to 110 ms) in VDD mode. The analysis of left ventricular filling showed that changes in AVD led to similar changes in mitral VTI. The MFD increased as the AVD was shortened to a constant value at the optimal AVD. In all patients, the optimal AVD was obtained when the MFD became maximal and constant. Measurement of MFD is a simple and rapid means of assessing optimal AVD at rest in patients with dual chamber pacing systems.
通过测量十三名双腔起搏器患者在不同房室延迟(AVD)间期(31至219毫秒或75至220毫秒)时的阻抗变化来测定每搏输出量(SV)。还通过多普勒超声心动图在每个AVD间期记录二尖瓣血流,测量二尖瓣血流持续时间(MFD)和速度时间积分(VTI)。对所有十三名患者采用DDD模式进行研究;此外,对5名患者采用心房感知心室起搏的VDD模式进行研究。通过阻抗体积描记法测量SV具有可重复性,平均变异性为3.5%:用这种方法确定了11名DDD模式患者和4名VDD模式患者的最佳AVD:在3名患者(2名DDD模式和1名VDD模式)中获得了2个最佳AVD。DDD模式下的最佳AVD为123±31毫秒(63至156毫秒),VDD模式下为91±17毫秒(63至110毫秒)。左心室充盈分析表明,AVD的变化导致二尖瓣VTI发生类似变化。当AVD缩短至最佳AVD时的恒定值时,MFD增加。在所有患者中,当MFD达到最大值并保持恒定时获得最佳AVD。测量MFD是评估双腔起搏系统患者静息时最佳AVD的一种简单快速的方法。