Covell D G, Smythers G W, Gronenborn A M, Clore G M
Biomedical Supercomputing Laboratory, PRI/Dyncorp, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, National Cancer Institute, Maryland 21702.
Protein Sci. 1994 Nov;3(11):2064-72. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560031119.
The chemokine family of chemotactic cytokines plays a key role in orchestrating the immune response. The family has been divided into 2 subfamilies, alpha and beta, based on the spacing of the first 2 cysteine residues, function, and chromosomal location. Members within each subfamily have 25-70% sequence identity, whereas the amino acid identity between members of the 2 subfamilies ranges from 20 to 40%. A quantitative analysis of the hydrophobic properties of 11 alpha and 9 beta chemokine sequences, based on the coordinates of the prototypic alpha and beta chemokines, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and human macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (hMIP-1 beta), respectively, is presented. The monomers of the alpha and beta chemokines have their strongest core hydrophobic cluster at equivalent positions, consistent with their similar tertiary structures. In contrast, the pattern of monomer surface hydrophobicity between the alpha and beta chemokines differs in a manner that is fully consistent with the observed differences in quaternary structure. The most hydrophobic surface clusters on the monomer subunits are located in very different regions of the alpha and beta chemokines and comprise in each case the amino acids that are buried at the interface of their respective dimers. The theoretical analysis of hydrophobicity strongly supports the hypothesis that the distinct dimers observed for IL-8 and hMIP-1 beta are preserved for all the alpha and beta chemokines, respectively. This provides a rational explanation for the lack of receptor crossbinding and reactivity between the alpha and beta chemokine subfamilies.
趋化性细胞因子的趋化因子家族在协调免疫反应中起关键作用。根据前两个半胱氨酸残基的间距、功能和染色体定位,该家族已被分为α和β两个亚家族。每个亚家族内的成员具有25 - 70%的序列同一性,而两个亚家族成员之间的氨基酸同一性范围为20%至40%。本文分别基于典型的α和β趋化因子白细胞介素-8(IL-8)和人巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1β(hMIP-1β)的坐标,对11种α趋化因子和9种β趋化因子序列的疏水特性进行了定量分析。α和β趋化因子的单体在等效位置具有最强的核心疏水簇,这与其相似的三级结构一致。相比之下,α和β趋化因子之间单体表面疏水性的模式不同,这与观察到的四级结构差异完全一致。单体亚基上最疏水的表面簇位于α和β趋化因子的非常不同的区域,并且在每种情况下都包含埋在其各自二聚体界面处的氨基酸。疏水性的理论分析有力地支持了这样的假设,即分别为IL-8和hMIP-1β观察到的独特二聚体也分别适用于所有α和β趋化因子。这为α和β趋化因子亚家族之间缺乏受体交叉结合和反应性提供了合理的解释。