Mirimanoff R O
Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lung Cancer. 1994 Nov;11 Suppl 3:S79-99. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(94)91869-4.
Stage III or locally advanced non-metastatic, non-small cell lung cancers comprise about 40% of all NSCLC. A proportion of patients with Stage III NSCLC can be treated by induction RT/CT followed by surgery, but the majority, in particular all Stage IIIB, are not candidates for this approach. For these patients, RT alone is generally considered as the standard treatment. RT has a modest, but definitive curative potential, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survivals of about 40%, 20% and 5%, respectively, and median survival of 9-12 months. Combination CT-RT, depending on its type and rationale, is aimed at improving survival via a decrease of local or distant failure rates or both. Combined modality (CM) can be subdivided into 3 categories: sequential, concomitant and alternated regimes. Concomitant and alternated CT-RT have some common characteristics and rationale, the overall time playing a central role. This paper reviews studies of inoperable NSCLC treated with these CM, excluding sequential CT-RT trials, which would require a separate discussion. Numerous Phase I-II studies have been recently published on concomitant or alternated schemes and 33 of them are presented in this paper. Although it is hazardous to readily compare their results with those of RT-alone studies, several trials using platin-based combination chemotherapy, concurrently or alternated with RT, have shown impressive response rates and encouraging survivals, at a price of significant toxicity. Seven randomized trials comparing RT alone versus concomitant CT-RT are now available: the 3 non-cisplatin trials have failed to show any improvement in survival with CM, whereas among the 4 cisplatin trials, only one demonstrated a benefit with low-dose cisplatin added to RT. Implications for future clinical research will be discussed.
Ⅲ期或局部晚期非转移性非小细胞肺癌约占所有非小细胞肺癌的40%。一部分Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者可先接受诱导放疗/化疗,然后进行手术治疗,但大多数患者,尤其是所有ⅢB期患者,不适合采用这种方法。对于这些患者,单纯放疗通常被视为标准治疗方法。放疗具有一定的、但确切的治愈潜力,1年、2年和5年生存率分别约为40%、20%和5%,中位生存期为9至12个月。联合放化疗,根据其类型和原理,旨在通过降低局部或远处失败率或两者来提高生存率。联合治疗模式(CM)可分为3类:序贯、同步和交替方案。同步和交替放化疗有一些共同的特点和原理,总治疗时间起着核心作用。本文回顾了采用这些联合治疗模式治疗不可切除非小细胞肺癌的研究,但不包括序贯放化疗试验,后者需要单独讨论。最近发表了许多关于同步或交替方案的Ⅰ-Ⅱ期研究,本文介绍了其中的33项。虽然将它们的结果与单纯放疗研究的结果直接比较存在风险,但一些使用铂类联合化疗、与放疗同步或交替进行的试验显示出令人印象深刻的缓解率和令人鼓舞的生存率,但代价是显著的毒性。目前有7项比较单纯放疗与同步放化疗的随机试验:3项非顺铂试验未能显示联合治疗模式在生存率方面有任何改善,而在4项顺铂试验中,只有1项显示在放疗中添加低剂量顺铂有获益。本文将讨论对未来临床研究的启示。