Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中强化胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病的可行性与疗效

Feasibility and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus in primary care.

作者信息

Fasching P, Derfler K, Maca T, Kurzemann S, Howorka K, Schneider B, Zirm M, Waldhäusl W

机构信息

Department of Medicine III, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1994 Nov;11(9):836-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00365.x.

Abstract

To determine the feasibility and efficacy of structured education in intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus commonly attended by primary care physicians, a prospective case-control study was carried out in co-operation with 26 general practitioners in rural Alpine region and the diabetes service at the University of Vienna, Medical School, Austria. From 89 rural Type 1 diabetic patients on conventional insulin therapy (CIT), those volunteering for better diabetes care (n = 52) were trained in IIT in the diabetes education centre and subsequently received their outpatient service by their general practitioners, as did those remaining on CIT (n = 37). Patients were matched as case-controls (n = 36 in each therapy group) for metabolic control at baseline (IIT/CIT: HbA1c 8.2 +/- 1.8 vs 8.1 +/- 2.0%, ns), age, duration of diabetes, incidence of retinopathy and nephropathy. Analysing an observation period of > 4.5 years, patients trained in IIT presented with improved metabolic control as compared to those on CIT (Mean HbA1c: IIT, 6.9 +/- 1.0%; CIT, 7.9 +/- 1.3%, p < 0.05, ANOVA). No difference between groups was, however, observed at the end-point of the study in HbA1c (IIT, 7.3 +/- 1.3%; CIT, 7.8 +/- 1.4%; IIT vs CIT, p = 0.14) and in the development of diabetic microangiopathy, frequency of reported severe hypoglycaemic episodes, and increase in body weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了确定在初级保健医生经常诊治的1型糖尿病患者中,强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)结构化教育的可行性和疗效,我们与奥地利维也纳医科大学阿尔卑斯山区农村的26名全科医生以及糖尿病服务部门合作开展了一项前瞻性病例对照研究。从89名接受常规胰岛素治疗(CIT)的农村1型糖尿病患者中,那些自愿接受更好糖尿病护理的患者(n = 52)在糖尿病教育中心接受了IIT培训,随后由他们的全科医生提供门诊服务,继续接受CIT治疗的患者(n = 37)也是如此。患者在基线时按病例对照进行匹配(每个治疗组n = 36),以确保代谢控制、年龄、糖尿病病程、视网膜病变和肾病的发病率相同(IIT/CIT:糖化血红蛋白8.2 +/- 1.8 vs 8.1 +/- 2.0%,无显著差异)。在分析超过4.5年的观察期时,接受IIT培训的患者与接受CIT治疗的患者相比,代谢控制得到改善(平均糖化血红蛋白:IIT为6.9 +/- 1.0%;CIT为7.9 +/- 1.3%,p < 0.05,方差分析)。然而,在研究终点时,两组在糖化血红蛋白(IIT为7.3 +/- 1.3%;CIT为7.8 +/- 1.4%;IIT与CIT相比,p = 0.14)、糖尿病微血管病变的发展、报告的严重低血糖发作频率以及体重增加方面没有差异。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验