Suppr超能文献

不稳定型科雷氏骨折采用外固定还是闭合髓内针固定?

External fixation or closed medullary pinning for unstable Colles fractures?

作者信息

Pritchett J W

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle 98144, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Mar;77(2):267-9.

PMID:7706344
Abstract

Fifty patients with complex distal radial fractures treated by primary external fixation were compared with 50 with similar fractures treated by closed medullary pinning. All the patients had Frykman type-VIII injuries. The two groups were similar in regard to demographic characteristics and the method of treatment was randomly chosen. All the fractures healed within three months. In the external fixation group 92% of fractures healed in excellent alignment as did 88% of the medullary pinning group. Both groups had similar results with respect to eventual function, range of motion, and grip strength. Complications and complaints were fewer and the estimated costs of treatment were significantly less in the medullary pinning group. More patients were satisfied with closed medullary fixation than with external fixation.

摘要

将50例采用一期外固定治疗的桡骨远端复杂骨折患者与50例采用闭合髓内针固定治疗类似骨折的患者进行比较。所有患者均为弗赖克曼Ⅷ型损伤。两组在人口统计学特征方面相似,治疗方法随机选择。所有骨折均在三个月内愈合。外固定组92%的骨折愈合良好,对位极佳,髓内针固定组这一比例为88%。两组在最终功能、活动范围和握力方面结果相似。髓内针固定组的并发症和投诉较少,估计治疗费用也显著较低。与外固定相比,更多患者对闭合髓内固定满意。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验