Kurt R A, Park J A, Panelli M C, Schluter S F, Marchalonis J J, Carolus B, Akporiaye E T
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arizona, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson 85724, USA.
J Immunol. 1995 Apr 15;154(8):3969-74.
Most tumors grow progressively and overwhelm the host. The rare but documented cases of spontaneous regression of primary tumors are indicative of the potential of tumor-bearing hosts to develop a significant antitumor response. Because most tumors grow progressively in the host, it is not surprising that the majority of studies have focused on T lymphocytes that infiltrate these tumors. Although these studies have generated significant and useful information during the period of tumor growth, they can only speculate on the mechanisms that are involved in tumor rejection. We have used a well developed sponge model of concomitant tumor immunity that allows us to compare the immunologic events that occur during tumor progression vs rejection. In this model, an animal harboring a primary EMT6 mammary tumor is challenged with a secondary tumor implant through a pre-implanted gelatin sponge. During the manifestation of concomitant tumor immunity, the secondary tumor is rejected and the effector cells mediating the response are retained within the sponge matrix. Using this model we analyzed the TCR usage, cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes, and cytokine production at both tumor sites. The data revealed that tumor-rejecting lymphocytes isolated from the site of secondary tumor implant were cytotoxic toward EMT6 cells, whereas tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes isolated from the progressing primary tumor were not. Interestingly, the TCR-V beta repertoire of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-rejecting lymphocytes were identical with V beta 1 and V beta 8 being predominant at both sites. Furthermore, the rejection site showed higher gene expression of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 whereas TGF-beta expression was slightly higher in the progressing tumors. These findings suggest that the disparate effector functions observed during tumor progression vs rejection are not caused by different T cell phenotypes but may be due instead to influences exerted by cytokines produced at the tumor sites.
大多数肿瘤呈进行性生长并压倒宿主。原发性肿瘤自发消退的病例虽罕见但有文献记载,这表明荷瘤宿主有产生显著抗肿瘤反应的潜力。由于大多数肿瘤在宿主体内呈进行性生长,因此大多数研究聚焦于浸润这些肿瘤的T淋巴细胞也就不足为奇了。尽管这些研究在肿瘤生长期间产生了重要且有用的信息,但它们只能推测参与肿瘤排斥的机制。我们使用了一种成熟的伴随肿瘤免疫海绵模型,该模型使我们能够比较肿瘤进展与排斥过程中发生的免疫事件。在这个模型中,携带原发性EMT6乳腺肿瘤的动物通过预先植入的明胶海绵接受继发性肿瘤植入的挑战。在伴随肿瘤免疫表现期间,继发性肿瘤被排斥,介导反应的效应细胞保留在海绵基质中。利用这个模型,我们分析了两个肿瘤部位的TCR使用情况、淋巴细胞的细胞毒性活性和细胞因子产生情况。数据显示,从继发性肿瘤植入部位分离出的肿瘤排斥淋巴细胞对EMT6细胞具有细胞毒性,而从进行性原发性肿瘤中分离出的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞则没有。有趣的是,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞和肿瘤排斥淋巴细胞的TCR-Vβ谱相同,Vβ1和Vβ8在两个部位均占主导。此外,排斥部位的IFN-γ、TNF-α和IL-10基因表达较高,而TGF-β表达在进行性肿瘤中略高。这些发现表明,在肿瘤进展与排斥过程中观察到的不同效应功能不是由不同的T细胞表型引起的,而是可能相反地归因于肿瘤部位产生的细胞因子所施加的影响。