Saah A J, Hoover D R, Peng Y, Phair J P, Visscher B, Kingsley L A, Schrager L K
Johns Hopkins University, School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md., 21205, USA.
JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1197-202.
To identify clinical and epidemiological factors associated with failure of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis in those receiving primary and secondary prophylaxis.
Longitudinal cohort study of participants infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study who used PCP prophylaxis regimens after their T-helper lymphocyte counts had decreased to less than 0.200 x 10(9)/L (200/microL).
Occurrence or recurrence of PCP.
A total of 476 participants reported taking one or more of the following regimens: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), dapsone, and/or aerosolized pentamidine--367 as primary prophylaxis and 109 as secondary prophylaxis after a previous episode of PCP. A total of 92 (20%) developed PCP despite prophylaxis. The mean failure rates per person-year of follow-up were 16.0% for those receiving primary prophylaxis and 12.1% for those receiving secondary prophylaxis (P = .19). Median times to death after initiation of primary or secondary prophylaxis were 2.0 and 1.2 years, respectively. The main predictor for failure of PCP prophylaxis was profound T-helper lymphocytopenia; 86% of failures occurred after T-helper cell counts decreased to less than 0.075 x 10(9)/L and 76% occurred after counts decreased to less than 0.050 x 10(9)/L. In multivariate time-dependent analysis, when compared with counts between 0.100 x 10(9)/L and 0.200 x 10(9)/L, the risk ratio for failure with counts less than 0.050 x 10(9)/L was 2.90 (P < .001). Once T-helper cell counts were considered, fever was the only other health status indicator that predicted subsequent PCP (ie, a time-dependent risk ratio of 2.22; P = .01). Use of TMP-SMX as the prophylaxis regimen was protective but did not eliminate failure (ie, a time-dependent risk ratio of 0.55; P = .03).
These findings strongly support identifying improved methods of PCP prophylaxis once T-helper cell counts decrease to less than 0.075 x 10(9)/L or 0.100 x 10(9)/L. Given this severe degree of immunosuppression, an inherently more effective regimen against P carinii is required.
确定在接受原发性和继发性预防的人群中,与卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)预防失败相关的临床和流行病学因素。
多中心艾滋病队列研究中,对感染1型人类免疫缺陷病毒且在其辅助性T淋巴细胞计数降至低于0.200×10⁹/L(200/μL)后使用PCP预防方案的参与者进行纵向队列研究。
PCP的发生或复发。
共有476名参与者报告使用了以下一种或多种方案:甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑(TMP - SMX)、氨苯砜和/或雾化戊烷脒——367人作为原发性预防,109人在先前发生PCP后作为继发性预防。尽管进行了预防,仍有92人(20%)发生了PCP。接受原发性预防者每人年的平均失败率为16.0%,接受继发性预防者为12.1%(P = 0.19)。开始原发性或继发性预防后的中位死亡时间分别为2.0年和1.2年。PCP预防失败的主要预测因素是严重的辅助性T淋巴细胞减少;86%的失败发生在辅助性T细胞计数降至低于0.075×10⁹/L之后,76%发生在计数降至低于0.050×10⁹/L之后。在多变量时间依赖性分析中,与计数在0.100×10⁹/L和0.200×10⁹/L之间相比,计数低于0.050×10⁹/L时失败的风险比为2.90(P < 0.001)。一旦考虑辅助性T细胞计数,发热是预测后续PCP的唯一其他健康状况指标(即时间依赖性风险比为2.22;P = 0.01)。使用TMP - SMX作为预防方案具有保护作用,但不能消除失败(即时间依赖性风险比为0.55;P = 0.03)。
这些发现有力地支持了一旦辅助性T细胞计数降至低于0.075×10⁹/L或0.100×10⁹/L,应确定改进的PCP预防方法。鉴于这种严重的免疫抑制程度,需要一种本质上更有效的抗卡氏肺孢子虫方案。