• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

湍流脉动速度:狭窄血管中信号损失的最重要决定因素。

Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.

作者信息

Oshinski J N, Ku D N, Pettigrew R I

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 1995 Feb;33(2):193-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330208.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.1910330208
PMID:7707909
Abstract

Studies of flow in a 90%-stenosis phantom were conducted to elucidate the parameters and mechanisms responsible for signal loss in MR angiographic images. The studies independently evaluated the effect of velocity, Reynolds number, turbulent fluctuation velocity, and turbulence intensity on the amount of post-stenotic signal loss. Results suggested that the magnitude of the turbulent fluctuation velocity, not merely the presence of turbulence or the intensity of turbulence, was the parameter that determined the extent of the signal loss. The study suggests that future flow phantom studies should be conducted with fluids having physiologic velocities and viscosities to obtain accurate levels of turbulent fluctuation velocities and hence reproduce results of in-vivo signal-loss patterns. The mechanism for signal loss is that the temporal and spatial variations of the turbulent fluctuation velocity cause a range of phases to be present within a voxel. Examination of the theoretical aspects of fluid turbulence suggest that shortening gradient durations and imaging during diastole may help reduce signal loss.

摘要

对90%狭窄模型中的血流进行了研究,以阐明磁共振血管造影图像中信号丢失的参数和机制。这些研究独立评估了速度、雷诺数、湍流脉动速度和湍流强度对狭窄后信号丢失量的影响。结果表明,决定信号丢失程度的参数是湍流脉动速度的大小,而不仅仅是湍流的存在或湍流强度。该研究表明,未来的血流模型研究应使用具有生理速度和粘度的流体进行,以获得准确的湍流脉动速度水平,从而重现体内信号丢失模式的结果。信号丢失的机制是湍流脉动速度的时空变化导致体素内存在一系列相位。对流体湍流理论方面的研究表明,缩短梯度持续时间和在舒张期成像可能有助于减少信号丢失。

相似文献

1
Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.湍流脉动速度:狭窄血管中信号损失的最重要决定因素。
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Feb;33(2):193-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330208.
2
Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995 Sep-Oct;19(5):692-9. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199509000-00002.
3
Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images.
Invest Radiol. 1988 Jul;23(7):512-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198807000-00006.
4
Two-layered model of Casson fluid flow through stenotic blood vessels: applications to the cardiovascular system.通过狭窄血管的卡森流体流动的两层模型:在心血管系统中的应用。
J Biomech. 1994 Jul;27(7):921-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90264-x.
5
Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms.二维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影术中湍流信号损失的计算模拟
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Apr;37(4):609-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910370421.
6
Shear-scaling-based approach for irreversible energy loss estimation in stenotic aortic flow - An in vitro study.基于剪切比例法的主动脉狭窄血流不可逆能量损失估计——一项体外研究
J Biomech. 2017 May 3;56:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
7
[Experimental studies on magnetic resonance tomographic and magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of poststenotic flow patterns].
Rofo. 1992 May;156(5):475-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032924.
8
Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography.磁共振血管造影中血流诱导信号丢失的机制。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992 Jul-Aug;2(4):453-62. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880020415.
9
Blood flow imaging through detection of temporal variations in magnetization.通过检测磁化强度的时间变化进行血流成像。
Radiology. 1992 Nov;185(2):559-67. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410373.
10
Characterization of flow emerging from a stenosis using MRI.使用磁共振成像对狭窄处流出的血流进行特征描述。
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Oct;40(4):559-70. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400409.

引用本文的文献

1
High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging features of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography signal loss and its relevance to ischemic stroke.时间飞跃磁共振血管造影信号丢失的高分辨率磁共振成像特征及其与缺血性卒中的相关性。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Sep 1;14(9):6820-6829. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-329. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Turbulence in surgical suction heads as detected by MRI.MRI 检测到手术吸引头中的湍流。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2023 Jun;55(2):70-81. doi: 10.1051/ject/2023015. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Gated 4D Flow Cardiac MR Image Acquisitions in the Carotid Bifurcation.
前瞻性和回顾性门控 4D 流心脏磁共振成像在颈动脉分叉处的比较。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Feb;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00630-6. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Intensity of arterial structure acquired by Silent MRA estimates cerebral blood flow.通过无声磁共振血管造影(Silent MRA)获取的动脉结构强度可估计脑血流量。
Insights Imaging. 2021 Dec 11;12(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01132-0.
5
Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients With Turbulent Aortic Flow.湍流主动脉血流患者主动脉反流的相位对比磁共振定量分析
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):317-322. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000819.
6
Improvement in visualization of carotid artery uniformity using silent magnetic resonance angiography.使用静音磁共振血管造影术改善颈动脉均匀性的可视化。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Mar;10(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0375-0. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.用于评估模型中狭窄后湍流的四维流动MRI:与流量计和计算流体动力学的比较
Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):3588-97. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4181-6. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.心血管磁共振与多普勒超声心动图在主动脉瓣狭窄跨瓣梯度测量中的差异:血流涡度的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 20;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-84.
9
In vitro validation of finite-element model of AAA hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions.包含实际出口边界条件的腹主动脉瘤血流动力学有限元模型的体外验证。
J Biomech Eng. 2011 Apr;133(4):041003. doi: 10.1115/1.4003526.
10
Nonenhanced methods for lower-extremity MRA: a phantom study examining the effects of stenosis and pathologic flow waveforms at 1.5T.非增强下肢 MRA 方法:1.5T 下狭窄和病理血流波形对成像影响的体模研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Feb;33(2):401-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22457.