Suppr超能文献

用第三代促甲状腺激素检测法评估两种左甲状腺素制剂品牌与第三种品牌的可互换性。

Assessment of interchangeability of two brands of levothyroxine preparations with a third-generation TSH assay.

作者信息

Escalante D A, Arem N, Arem R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1995 Apr;98(4):374-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80316-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate, in a prospective fashion, the clinical interchangeability between two brands of levothyroxine, Synthroid (Boots Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lincolnshire, Illinois) and Levoxine (Daniels Pharmaceuticals, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida), by using clinical scores of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, free thyroxine index (FTI), sensitive thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three of the 31 patients with long-standing primary hypothyroidism (6 men, 25 women; age range 30 to 71 years, mean 47.2 +/- 2.2 SEM) were switched from Synthroid to Levoxine (group 1) and the remaining patients from Levoxine to Synthroid (group 2). After switching, each patient continued to receive the same dosage as previously. Clinical scores of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism (Billewicz and Crooks scoring systems, respectively), basal FTI, and TRH stimulation test were obtained before and 4 months after the switching. Comparison of the variables before and after switching was performed separately in each subgroup and in the entire group.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the hypothyroid clinical scores (-40.1 +/- 1.2 versus -39.7 +/- 1.2), the hyperthyroid clinical scores (-19.6 +/- 0.9 versus -19.2 +/- 1.0), FTI (9.6 +/- 0.3 versus 9.6 +/- 0.3), basal TSH levels (1.4 +/- 0.2 versus 1.4 +/- 0.2 mIU/L), or the magnitude of TSH response to TRH (mean delta TSH 9.4 +/- 1.5 versus 9.2 +/- 1.4 mIU/L), whether the patients were receiving Synthroid or Levoxine.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching did not result in substantial clinical or laboratory changes in any individual patient. We conclude that the two brands of levothyroxine are clinically interchangeable.

摘要

目的

通过使用甲状腺功能亢进和减退的临床评分、游离甲状腺素指数(FTI)、敏感促甲状腺激素(TSH)以及促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)刺激试验,以前瞻性方式评估两种品牌左甲状腺素(优甲乐,博姿制药公司,伊利诺伊州林肯郡;以及左旋甲状腺素,丹尼尔斯制药公司,佛罗里达州圣彼得斯堡)之间的临床可互换性。

患者与方法

31例长期原发性甲状腺功能减退患者(6例男性,25例女性;年龄范围30至71岁,平均47.2±2.2标准误)中,23例从优甲乐换用左旋甲状腺素(第1组),其余患者从左旋甲状腺素换用优甲乐(第2组)。换药后,每位患者继续接受与之前相同的剂量。在换药前及换药后4个月,获取甲状腺功能减退和亢进的临床评分(分别采用比勒维茨和克鲁克斯评分系统)、基础FTI以及TRH刺激试验结果。在每个亚组和整个组中分别对换药前后的变量进行比较。

结果

无论患者服用的是优甲乐还是左旋甲状腺素,甲状腺功能减退临床评分(-40.1±1.2对-39.7±1.2)、甲状腺功能亢进临床评分(-19.6±0.9对-19.2±1.0)、FTI(9.6±0.3对9.6±0.3)、基础TSH水平(1.4±0.2对1.4±0.2 mIU/L)或TSH对TRH反应的幅度(平均△TSH 9.4±1.5对9.2±1.4 mIU/L)均无统计学显著差异。

结论

换药未导致任何个体患者出现明显的临床或实验室变化。我们得出结论,两种品牌的左甲状腺素在临床上可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验