Zammit M P, Hans M G, Broadbent B H, Johnsen D C, Latimer B M, Nelson S
Department of Orthodontics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Arctic Med Res. 1995 Jan;54(1):32-44.
Epidemiological studies of malocclusion of world populations have been previously limited to dental parameters. This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of malocclusion in the dentitions of Inuit (Eskimo) youth aged between 5-22 years from Labrador, Canada, using psychosocial, dental and skeletal (radiographic) parameters. Data were obtained from two communities, Nain (population 1079) and Hopedale (population 534). About 82% (n = 363) of the Inuit youth and 50% (n = 222) of their parents responded to the psychosocial questionnaires. In total, 78% (n = 348) of the Inuit youth were examined intraorally to determine the prevalence of malocclusion using the Treatment Priority Index (TPI), and 23% (n = 100) had cephalometric radiographs taken using a portable cephalometer. The results indicated that 95% of the Labrador Inuit youth examined had some degree of malocclusion, 10-16% were aware of their occlusal disharmonies, 55-65% wanted to have their teeth straightened, and 5% were teased by others because of their malocclusions. In addition, 63% of the parents seemed to be aware of their child's occlusal problems and 70% wished their children to wear orthodontic appliances if they were needed. Prevalence and awareness to malocclusion were positively correlated. According to the TPI, 18% had "severely handicapping" and 20% had "very severely handicapping" malocclusions. The TPI score increased with age from 5.25 in the young group to 8.05 in the older age group (mean 6.7). There were high prevalences of crowded anterior teeth, upper lingual posterior crossbites, and open or edge to edge bites. A prevalence of 35% Angle Class I, 49% Angle Class II and 16% Angle Class III molar relationships were observed. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated a mean wits measurement of -2.0 mm, a mean ANB angle of 4.7, a mean lower face height of 68.3 mm, a mean interincisal angle of 125 degrees and a mean frankfort mandibular plane angle of 31.3 degrees. A need for orthodontic care and further education were clearly indicated and highly recommended.
